Tag Archive: Corporate media


Julian Assange (The News Update)

Terrorist, really?

Few people in the past year have sparked debate in the manner that Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, has. His organization has become well-known for publishing material that is leaked by anonymous whistleblowers that often show wrongdoing on the parts of governments and corporations around the world, though a good deal of its notoriety stems from the publication of the Iraq War Logs and its bringing to light actual U.S. military footage of a helicopter crew shooting reporters and civilians in Baghdad, a video that the group entitled “Collateral Murder”.

The release of documents pertaining to the U.S. military and the U.S. Department of State resulted in an outcry by conservatives across the country who claimed that Assange had hurt the national security of the United States and that he had exposed a number of U.S. military informants in Afghanistan, claims that Assange strongly denies. Fox News Correspondents and familiar Republican faces such as Mike Huckabee and Sarah Palin called Julian Assange a traitor, though he is actually Australian and therefore can not commit treason against the U.S., and they even went so far as to call for his assassination within days of the shooting of Gabriel Giffords in Arizona.

While calls for assassination rang out at Fox News, the rest of the American media played up the angle that WikiLeaks had damaged American national interests because it had published diplomatic cables that contained confidential and embarrassing information about foreign dignitaries and diplomats. The cables did certainly create a good deal of awkwardness at the State Department, but rather than focus on any specifics, the general treatment among the major networks was downright tabloid. For example, in this piece, ABC News focused on non-substantive comments in the cables that essentially resort to the level of name calling. And far from being hard hitting, ABC did not make a terribly strong case. From the piece, we find out that Libya’s Ghadafi is considered “wierd”. This could hardly be of any surprise, but we learn nothing of the real nuggets of information found in the documents from the ABC piece – a trend that you will see is quite prominent in American media.

The Administration’s Response – and from Corporate America

The reaction from the Obama Administration was rather strong. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton condemned the release of the diplomatic cables. Their release certainly made her job difficult. But did the release of the cables truly affect the relations between the U.S. and other countries to the degree that she has claimed? For her part, Julian Assange did suggest that Secretarty Clinton should resign, “if it can be shown that she was responsible ordering U.S. diplomatic figures to engage in espionage in the United Nations.” (Go to 2:20 in the video for the quote.) Unfortunately, most of the American press reported that with the headline to the effect: Assange: Clinton Should Resign, ignoring a rather important subjunctive clause, but also skillfully avoiding the reasoning behind Assange’s statement. Mr. Assange made that statement with the revelation from his group that the U.S. State Department had begun a program to try to gain information about foreign dignitaries by the use of biometrics and espionage. If the State Department is trying to spy on other leaders, suddenly the peaceful and “candid discussions” that Secretary Clinton mentioned in the ABC News video would certainly take a very different tone, but once again, there is no information in the ABC report about these potentially unethical clandestine actions by the State Department.

Presidential Candidate Obama discusses open government in 2008 (Glass Booth.org, via YouTube)

President Obama campaigned in part on the notion of openness in the Federal Government. Obama had also signed whistleblower protections early during his presidency. One bill strengthened whistleblower protections for the employees of companies contracting with the Federal Government and he strengthened whistleblower rights in the recently-passed Food Safety Act. Yet, despite this early support for openness in government, President Obama was now in the rather uncomfortable position that he was in charge of the organization losing leaked information.

Despite the discomfort, the White House Press Secretary, Robert Gibbs, challenged Fox News by saying that the White House is not afraid of one guy with a laptop. He also went on to say that those who leaked information are subject to a Department of Justice criminal investigation as well. But while president Obama claimed to be in support of an open, censorship-free internet after the Diplomatic Cables release, it was quite clear that his Justice Department was in fact strongly pursuing an investigation into the the potential for ties between Julian Assange and the alleged leaker, Private Bradley Manning.

President Obama discusses open internet in December, 2010 (Stop the War Coalitino, via YouTube)

It was around that time in early December, 2010, that Swedish allegations of “sex by surprise”, not rape as reported by the American media, forced Assange to remain in place in Britain, even serving some time in solitary confinement until his bond was secured. He remains without charge from Sweden, though he has been fighting his extradition to Sweden out of concern that he would be extradited again to the United States. It was also made public that one of the women who had accused Assange of rape was actually tied to the CIA. WikiLeaks also found it difficult to receive donations because companies like PayPal, Visa and Mastercard cut off services to WikiLeaks, though the latter two do allow donations to the KKK! It is strongly suspected that the Obama Administration was partially responsible for convincing those companies to cut their financial ties to WikiLeaks.

One company, VISA, did hire a firm to investigate WikiLeaks to determine whether it could find any wrongdoing by the group and found none. VISA has yet to allow donations to flow back to WikiLeaks, despite the findings having come out roughly three months ago.

Assange in his own words

So who is this Julian Assange? Is he the terrorist described by Fox News? The guy who is hurting American national security like the U.S. mainstream press argues? Is he a supporter of free speech and open government?

To this point we have heard from virtually everyone but Julian Assange himself. But to fully understand his comments, we can not confine ourselves to the American mass media. First, let us take a look at a speech that he gave to the Oslo Freedom Forum in 2010.

Julian Assange speaks at the Oslo Freedom Forum, April 2010 (Oslo Freedom Forum, via YouTube)

In that speech, Assange describes how his organization tries not to know the names of the whistleblowers in order to protect itself as well as the whistleblowers. WikiLeaks tries to protect whistleblowers as much as possible, while using freedom of speech laws around the world to their maximum extent to ensure that the leaked information remains public and protected from attempts to shut websites down.

The stakes are quite high. After minute 5:15 in the Oslo Speech, Assange mentions the salient point that with today’s electronic media, the information repositories of the West are becoming concentrated in fewer hands. While it was once true that people could see missing pages in book in Soviet Libraries, it is now possible to remove websites without a trace. This is a very well-thought out position on transparency of information in the electronic era. There have already been examples, as Assange continues, in which stories of scandals have slipped into the Orwellian “memory hole”. The protection of information against consolidated control is to make it public and to ensure that thousands of copies of that information can be found across the internet. By making information public, WikiLeaks says that it provides the tools that the public needs in order to hold its leaders accountable for their actions.

Julian Assange speaks at TED, July 2010 (TED, via YouTube)

In another speech at TED, Assange discusses some of the types of documents that WikiLeaks has released to the public, including the release of Collateral Murder (around 5:30). At one point, Assange makes a very intriguing statement, “Capable and generous men do not create victims, they nurture people.” This is hardly a statement by the vindictive radical of Fox News’ imaginings.

Listen to Assange discuss his own reaction to the video in the following video from an interview conducted by Al Jazeera. At not point does Assange attempt to hyperbolize what can be seen on the video screen.

Julian Assange discusses 'Collateral Murder' (Al Jazeera, via YouTube)

The Al Jazeera interview also includes commentary by Ivan Eland, a national security analyst from the Cato Institute (hardly an anti-military institution). Eland describes the actions from the lens of the military while Assange describes the situation from the perspective of the victims. Al Jazeera does a great job of showing similarities and dissonances between the two perspectives to give the viewer a rather impressive perspective of the incident in which American helicopter pilots gunned down a number of innocent bystanders. This is not the type of portrayal of the U.S. military that one sees in the United States. Rather, a better example of American portayal can be seen here:

Wolf Blitzer reports on 'Collateral Murder' (CNN, via YouTube)

CNN did not show the entire video. They did not mention that the “weapons” described by the helicopter pilots were actually cameras, but they did stop just before the helicopter opened fire and just after the letters “RPG” appear on the screen. The net effect of this editing is to give the viewer the impression that the helicopter pilots were in the right by defending themselves against a potential rocket propelled grenade attack. Wolf then cuts to Barbara Starr, CNN’s Pentagon correspondent, who touts the Pentagon’s line without question: That the people had been investigated and that no fault was found. Yet Starr never describes the extent of the investigation, nor does she comment on the rest of the video. She also propagates the lie that other troops were attacked nearby that day. Finally, the journalist Starr rather callously mentions that the deaths of these journalists can simply be added to the death toll of 129 to that point in the Iraq War.

So CNN all but asks the viewer not to worry, nothing to see here people… just journalists dying despite the fact that journalists are given legal protections even in war zones – protections that are never mentioned despite the large number of deaths of journalists by the U.S. military. That is the American mainstream media in a nutshell. When the need for information and transparency is palpable, CNN obscured the facts in order to provide the Pentagon a blanket of plausible deniability. Later, CNN posted an article online entitled “Secretive website WikiLeaks may be posting more U.S. military video”, a clear effort to discredit WikiLeaks without bringing any new information to the fore.

This is not to say that high-ranking officials should necessarily be charged with corruption because of the actions of much lower-ranking pilots. Nor does Assange make that case. However, the incident may certainly warrant a review of the specific ways in which loose rules of engagement may have resulted in the deaths of a number of innocent people that way. Perhaps there is a way to address civilian deaths that will heighten the safety for troops and civilians alike – neither we nor the Pentagon will know unless the matter is investigated and that will not happen unless there is public pressure to do so.

The added benefit for political leaders may be that after having encountered a number of incidents in which mistakes were made, the public may develop a more nuanced view regarding the myriad ways in which such unfortunate instances could happen. That may mean that the public could better differentiate between instances in which an undesirable outcome resulted from good-faith efforts, versus cases of corruption. The public would likely be more forgiving in the former cases, which could give politicians more latitude in their efforts to improve conditions at home as well. That is why there is a need to bring details about events like these to light.

More on the media perception of Assange

After the release of Collateral Murder and the release of Iraq and Afghanistan War documents, the line in the media became the accusation that Julian Assange and WIkiLeaks were attempting to attack U.S. national security. That is a charge that Julian Assange deftly handles here in an interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper.

Anderson Cooper interviews Julian Assange (CNN, via YouTube)

After the release of the American diplomatic cables, Julian Assange was of course charged with sex crimes in Sweden and the timing is clearly suspicious. The American press wasted no time in ensuring that future interviews with Assange were about him rather than the information that he was attempting to present.

Increasingly, the theme in American media was about Julian Assange himself. For example, an October, 2010 interview with CNN avoided the contents of WikiLeaks releases, but rather focussed on Julian Assange’s personality and the early reports of allegations of rape. This led to Assange walking out of the interview while he was attempting to steer the interview back toward the contents of WikiLeaks’ latest document release.

A short time later, Assange related to Larry King why he had walked out of the interview, namely to ensure that media attention remains on the deaths of innocent victims during a time of war. When Daniel Ellsberg (the leaker of the Pentagon Papers) calls for an investigation over the matters that WikiLeaks released, Larry King called an end to the segment:

Larry King interviews Julian Assange and Daniel Ellsberg (CNN, via YouTube)

In January, CBS’ 60 Minutes did an interview with Assange in Britain at the location of his house arrest. You will find the entire interview is chock full of references to the “mysterious” “strange” or “enigmatic” Assange – but you will hear very few details regarding the actual contents of WikiLeaks releases. Interviewer Steve Kroft asks questions that essentially carry water for the Pentagon throughout the interview. Assange actually instructs Kroft on a number of points regarding the practice of journalism in Part I, as well as reminding Kroft of the importance of America’s First Amendment in his own work. Part II of the interview covers Assange’s past, with descriptions of his “frequently uprooted” childhood and his hacking activities. There are a number of great exchanges where Assange is able to directly respond to Pentagon and State Department accusations and he does it quite well.

60 Part I: Minutes interviews Julian Assange (CBS News)

Part II: 60 Minutes interviews Julian Assange (CBS News)

Unfortunately, 60 Minutes played the “enigmatic” angle heavily during its normal showtime, but Steve Kroft and the production staff do discuss (in rather surprising contrast) how they perceived Assange to be rather genuine in his beliefs and actions during their own reflections on 60 Minutes Overtime. And the disappointing dearth of information regarding WikiLeaks’ revelations is described in detail in an article by David Swanson.

How stark is the American media portrayal of Julian Assange? Thanks to the wonderful world of the internet, it is possible to directly compare American interviews such as those by CBS and CNN with interviews by reporters from the Netherlands and Australia. Viewing the last two sample videos and the Al Jazeera interview earlier shows American just what they have been missing: A press that seeks to inform the public rather than to cover up excesses by the U.S. Government.

Without such transparency as that displayed by international news sources, it is unlikely that citizens of the United states will be able to ensure the safety of their own family members who are sent into harm’s way from the excesses of a national security state that creates an environment in which otherwise well-intentioned soldiers can become excited for the next kill. How much less violence might there have been in Iraq and how many fewer people – Iraqis and Americans alike – if the people in Iraq were not subject to such unfair rules of operation that ‘shoot first and ask questions later’ should be the rule of the day? That is, after all, what WikiLeaks claims to do: To provide the transparency required for citizens to make informed decisions on their own.

Now that you have finally seen the major players give their cases in their own words, you can finally decide for yourself: Is Julian Assange truly an ideological terrorist acting to destroy the United States, or is he facing attacks by the same people who profit from unceasing wars whose current estates are now jeopardized by WikiLeaks, or is there some other combination of factors taking place? How would one even be able to consider all of the possibilities, given American mainstream reporting alone? Now that you have seen actual details and reporting, you have the ability to decide for yourself.

Advertisements

Republican Congressman Peter King (Manuel Balce Ceneta, AP)

Cracks in the Façade

Since President George W. Bush (not Congress!) declared America’s Global War on Terror during the tragic fall of 2001, its armed forces have been engaged in conflicts around the world. American engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan have received the lion’s share of the press coverage, owing as much to the intensity of the action as well as to the falsity of the claims that led to the Iraqi action, though the U.S. is still active in both countries, along with Yemen and now Pakistan. Support for all of these wars has been spurred by the meme: The threat of violent Islam.

Louie Gohmert (R-TX) even decried terror babies that were being born and bred to infiltrate the United States. That is right, terrorists are born that way even if gays are not! Regardless of the “financial advantage that terrorists gain” Gohmert claims by living in the United States, do we not have confidence that terrorists might come to peace with their new standard of living?

Louie Gohmert and Anderson Cooper on 'terror babies'

We are told that everything that one need concern themselves about the wars are encapsulated in that phrase. The threat of violent Islam. It tells us Islam is violent by nature. We are threatened by it. In our fear, we react (ironically, violently) in order to protect ourselves – because they do not know peace. Presidents Bush and Obama both promised to attack this extremism wherever it can be found, lest the threat ever reach our shores.

But worldwide conflicts require military equipment and the fighting have been incredibly lucrative for American defense contractors. The profit-driven media conglomerates that derive their revenue by selling ad spots for these defense companies have found a honey pot in hard times. Hence there should be no surprise that the main stream media have been complicit in beginning wars under false pretenses as well as promoting the meme: The threat of violent Islam. “They hate us because of who we are!” “They want to destroy America!” They must be stopped!

The attacks on reason and the coercions are broadly based. All while we hear the slogans and calls for action on TV, salon monkeys such as David Brooks – a politically active commentator for the New York Times – goes on the writers circuit touting his book while encouraging people to make spontaneous and emotionally charged decisions, as if he were working in a vacuum.

Yet the spreading peaceful demonstrations against dictatorships that had been supported by the American military industrial complex (remember Made in the U.S.A. in Tahrir Square?) has placed a crimp in both the popularity in supporting puppet dictators as well as a realization that there is another route to peace: Peace itself. Peace, solidarity and human rights are now the considerations of Americans when they look to the Middle East as the labor and democracy movements there inspire the growing labor and democracy movement at home. Many Americans no longer see Islam as violent by nature, but they do see Muslims, Christians and Secular Arabs working together in order to ensure a better life for themselves. They are beginning to realize that democratically-elected leaders who prop up dictators have no respect for the democracy that they protect.

The defense industry and the media have an advertising problem because people are now becoming aware of the misinformation that they have spread for the sake of corporate profits and lowering wages at home. Most of all, when Americans look to the Middle East, they are increasingly seeing themselves.

As a result, people who see an alternative have been flocking away from the mainstream media and toward NPR and PBS, whose coverage of international affairs has been very good in stark contrast to the corporate media. Listeners to NPR routinely rank higher than Fox, CNN and Network news in terms of their knowledge about current events. And the situation is even more stark in radio: Right wing radio is being eviscerated at a time when NPR ratings are on the rise. People can now tell the difference between information and propaganda.

That NPR, a non-profit organization, is now directly competing with profit-driven organizations like Fox and CNN makes NPR very dangerous indeed. It means that the profit-driven news model, already teetering on collapse, faces new pressures from an organization that does not need to pay dividends to stockholders. For the political class, the quality of NPR’s reporting it means that listeners are increasingly hearing dissenting points of view and that makes them less likely to listen to the propaganda – including the propaganda that capitalism is the best economic model always. (Just ignore that NPR is a non-profit. Look over here! A muslim radical! And he is a SOCIALIST!) People will be less likely to support wars in distant places, now understanding the true costs involved. That will affect profit margins in defense, the news and politics alike.

In the world of American politics as infected with aggressive mendacity as it is, whither the news organization at the head of the class?

Coordinated attack?

Last Thursday was yet another highly ironic day in Washington D.C. Two days after the major media widely promoted the sting operation on NPR by James O’Keefe that supposedly led to NPR CEO Vivian Schiller and executive Ron Schiller (no relation) to step down. NPR denies it, though many corporate news organizations argued it was because of their biased views of the Tea Party being a racist and xenophobic organization, Tea Party Republican Congressman Peter King opened his hearings on Muslim Extremism in the United States.

The recent activity revolving around Islam seems to be a coordinated distract, divide and confuse operation by the right. It would be a way to divide the NPR audience, to place the attention of the news cycle on militant Islam once again, to distract from the pro-democracy movements and to cause people to think emotionally again – going against the grain of NPR programming.

The plan to hold hearings on Muslim extremists had been known long in advance. Here is a link to a Talking Points Memo article regarding the hearings, dated 17 December, 2011. There would have been plenty of time for James O’Keefe to coordinate the February 22nd meeting with Ron Schiller of NPR, and there would have been time to release the hidden video tape prior to the hearings on March 9th – just in time to distract attention from Peter King’s hearings, which in addition to a more complete conversation regarding violent extremism in the U.S. as a whole, had already received well-balanced treatment by NPR in January.

The January NPR piece discussed violent extremism in its widest sense, primarily in the wake of Gabriel Giffords shooting earlier that month. In addition to discussing radical Islam, its conversation included comments about right-wing extremists such as Timothy McVeigh and other individuals such as Ted Kaczynski and Jared Loughner. The piece brought in voices as various as the heads of the Tea Party Express and the Southern Poverty Law Center, but this was not the type of attention that Peter King was seeking for his high-profile hearings.

The Players

Last year, Andrew Breitbart attacked the US Department of Agriculture for its handling of legal settlements for African American farmers who have faced discrimination from the USDA. Breitbart alleged fraud and discrimination against whites in claims that continued from an earlier scandal during the case of Shirley Sherrod during the spring of 2010. Sherrod has since sued Breitbart for defamation of the case, and she is certain to win it due to the fact that Andrew Breitbart publicized a snippet of her comments in the exact opposite context in which they were intended. (Here is the Breitbart video. And here is the whole thing.) The entire issue had been reported heavily by NPR.

Andrew Breitbart is the same person who brought James O’Keefe to fame in the now infamous case where O’Keefe dressed as a (rather unconvincing) pimp and spliced video together to falsely claim that the community action group Acorn was supporting prostitution for public funds. Acorn won a lawsuit over defamation, but still lost public funding due to the wild political connotations that were now associated with its reputation. Breitbart was instrumental in having the segment aired on Fox and Friends.

Since that time, O’Keefe’s other “journalistic” adventures include trying to lure CNN’s Abbie Boudreau into a “den of sin”. He had planned to essentially sexually harass her while she was supposed to interview him in an effort to discredit CNN, but she found out and exposed the plot.

In another incident, O’Keefe was arrested for infiltrating Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu’s office in New Orleans to wiretap her office – a felony. O’Keefe mentioned that he was trying to expose Landrieu’s support for the health care reform bill. O’Keefe plead guilty but was only sentenced to 75 hours of community service and $1,500 in fines.

As early as October, 2010, Representative King had called to defund NPR. On the 22nd of that month, Politico quoted him after NPR’s firing of Juan Williams over his racist statement regarding how he felt nervous when Muslims boarded his flights:

“NPR has disgraced itself by caving into CAIR [Council on American-Islamic Relations] and by firing Juan Williams for exercising his right of free speech. This is political correctness carried to its extreme form. Congress should move to defund NPR because of its indefensible bias.”

This led to a row between Fox News and NPR regarding the supposedly “politically-motivated” firing of a conservative journalist. Actually, Juan Williams was fired for his bigoted comments on the O’Reilly Factor. With Fox losing viewership to NPR, there could be a concern that Fox was merely working with leftovers from NPR. So what does one do? What Fox was designed to do: Make relentlessly repeated petty political attacks until people begin to memorize the slogans. In fact, Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. is giving millions of dollars to Fox News to support its war on NPR. And most ironically of all, Fox News is complaining about bias!

It has not worked – NPR is still growing – and Peter King is a very frequent guest on Fox News – especially in segments regarding race. Peter King also receives a good deal of political contributions from defense contractors, communications companies and lobbying groups – Koch Industries, too, like any good Tea Partier.

King rather infamously took part in a television show just prior to the hearings. The show was produced for a group called Act! for America, a conservative group that is against the spread of radical Islam. The tactics of this group, however, leave much to be desired. In her book, Because They Hate: A Survivor of Islamic Terror Warns America, founder Brigitte Gabriel claims that she says “what many in America are thinking but afraid to say out loud, for fear of being labeled a racist, bigot, Islamophobic, or intolerant.” Yet Representative King decided to participate in a rather one-sided show for the group anyway. See for yourself:

The ACT for America Show (Act! for America, via Youtube)

Remember, those were Muslim rockets! This group clearly has an axe to grind, yet Peter King resisted complaints that suggested that he was enacting the hearings for political gamesmanship and he refused to discuss the notion of violent extremism on the whole.

Act! for America has cooperated with the Chino Tea Party (the branch of the Tea Party based in Chino, CA) to support demonstrations against Muslims and Muslim groups. A screenshot of an announcement for a February Act! America/Tea Party demonstration against a fundraising event for the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) is shown here:

Chino Tea Party/Act! America Announcement of anti-muslim protest (Chino Tea Party)

Given the tone of the rhetoric in such an announcement, one may be curious about the nature of that protest. Here is video of the protest:

Chino Tea Party/Act! America anti-muslim protest, Yorba Linda, CA, 2/13/2011 (George M. Collins, via RealityDictates on YouTube)

The cheers after the death threats in the above video are typically reserved in mainstream media for “Islamic militants”, though you clearly heard that from caucasian citizens of Orange County, CA. The demonstrated ignorance with the assumption of a difference between “God” and “Allah” was an added bonus around 4:17. Why would Peter King associate himself with this group just prior to holding hearings in which to inform himself on the issue of violent extremism?

The Hearings

There is also irony that Peter King would hold a hearing on violent extremism to say the least. As it happens, Representative King has a long history of support for another violent and extreme group, the Irish Republican Army. At one point in 1985, he told a pro-I.R.A. rally:

“If civilians are killed in an attack on a military installation, it is certainly regrettable, but I will not morally blame the I.R.A. for it.”

Representative King’s hearings did not include the vast majority of the thousand or so violent or hate-driven groups that are organized around the country. Still, they led to an interesting view both into the mindset of the Congressman and his influence on people around him. Here are King’s opening statements:

Rep. King opening comments to Homeland Security Committee Hearing on radical Islam (House Committee on Homeland Security, via YouTube)

Not only is radical Islam a problem, but so too are the forces of political correctness! But Neo-nazis are apparently not a problem for Rep. King.

“There is no equivalency of threat between al Qaeda and Neo-Nazis, environmental extremists, or other isolated mad men. Only al-Qaeda and Islamist affiliates in this country are a part of an international threat to our nation.”

With a start like that, how did the hearings go? As Talking Points Memo states it: Peter King Hearing Focuses On Whether Peter King Hearing Was A Good Idea. Rep. Charlie Dingell (D-MI) cautioned against the McCarthyite atmosphere around the hearings. But some of the most emphatic testimony from the hearings was from Representative Keith Ellison (D-MN), the lone Muslim in Congress, shown here.

Rep. Ellison comments to Homeland Security Committee Hearing on radical Islam (House C-Span 3, via YouTube)

One interesting comment by Ellison: The best protection against violent extremism is social and economic inclusion. That is not the type of statement that supports the militarization of the planet.

But what of the threat of violent Islam? It is certainly true there are violent Islamic extremists. One, supported by the U.S. since the end of the Bush Administration, is currently attacking his own citizens in Libya. They had the temerity to stand up and demand democracy. Another extremist is a dictator in Yemen, who is currently supported by the U.S. military as it enacts drone strikes on Al Qaeda cells in that country – acts that have led to the uprising for democracy that are taking place there. Osama bin Laden is still at large, likely in the mountains of western Pakistan, and he himself was supported by the U.S. while he and the Taliban were part of the Mujahadeen during the war between the Soviet Union and Afghanistan. Everywhere that one finds violent Islamic organizations, one finds dealings the U.S. military and the dictator de jour who is supported to keep the oil spigots running. Perhaps we should listen to Keith Ellison. Unfortunately, each of the major cable news networks, Fox New, MSNBC and CNN, showed Rep. King’s statements, but they cut away before the Democrats Bennie Thompson and Keith Ellison spoke! There is a reason why the Keith Ellison clip above was from C-Span 3.

Schiller’s comments

Let us consider who is right in the argument regarding NPR. Here is what Schiller said:

Ron Schiller discusses the Tea Party with a fake muslim group (AP, via Youtube)

While it might be disconcerting to hear a news executive give his own personal opinions on politics, what part of what he said was wrong? It would be incorrect to claim that all Tea Partiers are racist and that all of them are fundamentalist Christians, but Schiller does not specifically make that claim. It is certainly true that the Tea Party is connected to racist groups. That case has been made in this article, and in addition, a white supremacist played an important role in writing the Arizona immigration law last year. Which group is currently supporting elimination of restrictions on firearms? Which one is enacting anti-immigration laws all over the country? It is the Tea Party in each case. NPR should not have repudiated Schiller’s statements.

As for the liberal bias of NPR, here is a piece that it aired regarding the entire James O’Keefe affair. Listen to it and ask the question, “Would Fox News ever be so complete and self-critical in any of the stories it airs?”

NPR also refused the false $5 million donation prior to the release of the O’Keefe video.

Postscript

Despite all of the posturing over radical Muslims, the fact remains that the dominant form of extremism in the United States is right-wing extremism. One case of right-wing extremism came to light Friday when Francis “Schaeffer” Cox and four accomplices, all “sovereign citizens” who believe they are subject to no governmental authority, were arrested for plotting to kill a federal judge and a number of Alaska State Troopers.

UPDATE

The Atlantic is now reporting that NPR has released a couple of internal emails. They show that NPR was not duped by the fake muslim organization and they also demonstrate strict adherence to the law when it regards donations. In short, James O’Keefe’s dishonesty managed to show just how great a public organization NPR truly is. On the other hand, aren’t there laws against entrapment?

Jon Stewart Defends Teachers (The Daily Show)

Wisconsin State Capitol (rbw)

After a Dane County Court ruled that the State was violating a prior ruling to allow protesters into the State Capitol, the scene at the Capitol was quiet once protesters left peacefully in accordance with the part of the ruling that prohibits nighttime sleepovers in the building. However, the cynical action by the Governor was not finished. Members of the Walker Administration claimed that it may take as much as $7 million to repair the damage done during the 2-week sleepover in the building. Though when pressed by the media, the Walker Administration was forced to backtrack, indicating that there was no damage to the building and all that was necessary was a through cleaning, including removing signs taped to the marble interior.

That was not all. The police presence at the State Capitol remains strong, though many officers are working during the day, only to join the protests after their shifts are complete. Democratic Assemblyman Nick Milroy of South Range was tackled to the ground when he tried to enter his office to get his coat. Video of the incident can be seen on WISN.

Because of the lockdown earlier this week, Democratic Legislators moved their desks outside so that they could meet with their constituents. Republicans did not apparently want to meet their constituents, in contrast, because they kept their desks inside during the lockdown. The Dems have kept their desks outside, even after visitors could enter the Capitol again.

After .22 caliber bullets were found in several locations around the State Capitol Thursday, visitors to the Capitol were screened heavily for weapons. Because of the incredibly peaceful nature of the protests so far and because Governor Walker has already admitted to considering to bring thugs in to create trouble, the discovery of the bullets has prompted Wisconsin ex-Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager to say:

“For all we know somebody planted them there — we don’t know if it was a protester.”

Thanks to the 14 Democratic Senators who are still in Illinois on their own dime, under the threat of an unconstitutional arrest, more details of the Koch-supported Budget “Repair” bill are coming to light. The ramifications are profound, including a $1billion cut to education across the state, the budget could end interlibrary book loans, it would force local referendums in order to maintain services, and strip collective bargaining rights for union employees, as well as end their subsidized child care. In a nod to the insurance companies that backed his campaign financially, the bill would also gut the self-supporting Wisconsin State Insurance Fund. This is a crystal clear example of companies giving candidates contributions for political services.

It would not be the only corruption on the part of Scott Walker. The Milwaukee Magazine has outlined cronyism and corruption that occurred in the Milwaukee County pension system under Walker’s watch. He has violated a Dane County judge by refusing entry for demonstrators into the Capitol. He has apparently lied to the press, who are now suing, over the notion that he had received a large number of emails in favor of his budget proposal. He likely broke the law when he mentioned that he had considered sending thugs to create trouble to discredit the protests and he is clearly in the pocket of the Koch brothers, given his friendly relationship with them, and he has been threatening state workers with pink slips if he does not get his way, a form of political coercion. In addition to all of that, Walker likely broke state labor laws by refusing to negotiate with the unions. Laura Flanders discussed these legal issues with Lautenschlager.

With his legal exposure, the story gets worse for Walker. Recall efforts are underway for 8 Republican Senators and they are going swimmingly. The recall of three senators gives the Democrats a majority and the recall of all 8 gives them a 2/3 majority, which they could use to bring about impeachment hearings. Scott Walker’s window to pass his budget is closing and he knows it: Some Republicans may even break with the party if it comes up for a vote.

So do the mainstream media William Rivers Pitt discusses why the mainstream media has not been reporting the huge crowds in Madison, preferring to discuss Charlie Sheen instead. In short, he says “I think they’re scared.” More on media coverage later!

Protesters in Madison (via Rossomando Report)

There is plenty of good news coming from Wisconsin. Wisconsin workers have filed recall petitions against the eight Republican State Senators who can be recalled immediately. The AFL-CIO piece quotes a Steelworker:

Gov. Walker and Senate Republicans are refusing to listen to the hundreds of thousands of working families who traveled to Madison to make their voices heard. He has refused to listen to the majority of the people of this state who disagree with them. So now it is time for us to make our voices heard in their districts. If they will not listen to “we the people” then the “we the people” are going to take our government back.

The independent media is shining in its coverage of the corporate takeover of Wisconsin. New information continues to be released indicating that corporations do not pay their fair share of taxes, of the criminal enterprises of the Koch brothers, and the Kochs are losing the battle of public opinion. Several recent polls indicate that Americans are roughly 60-30% against stripping unions of collective bargaining rights and Walker’s approval rating is in the 30s and sinking.

In other news, Democrat Tom Barrett would win in a recall election against Governor Walker – an even that is almost guaranteed considering that Rachel Maddow is now reporting that half of Wisconsin wants the Governor to be recalled. The Wisconsin Democratic Party is now funding the campaign to recall these officials. Wisconsin will have a different legislature and it will eventually have a new governor and the longer that the protests and the Democratic Senators hold out, the more likely Scott Walker can be found liable for a crime. Even the Republican Party is turning on Walker. According to The Progressive:

Since 1871, there has been a civil rights statute on the books entitled “Conspiracy Against Rights” (See TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 241.)

It reads as follows:

“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same . . . They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.”

So put pressure on Scott Walker. Write to the Attorney General and demand that he investigate the “phone call” and Walker’s connections to the Koch brothers. And when A.G. Van Hollen refuses, demand that he step down as well. When the Kochs, the Governor and his cronies are forced to defend themselves, the workers go on offense and then they can repair the damage that has been done to the state.

There is a lot of great news! Keep up the awesome work! Write your newspapers and TV stations, contact everyone you can. If we keep it up, we will win!

A full slate of protests are continuing as well. Check the SEIU and the Wisconsin AFL-CIO websites for detais, but here is a breakdown of locations for activities:

Thursday, 3 March, 2011
Burlington
Kenosha
Janesville
Jefferson
Juneau
Rhinelander
Superior
Whitewater

Friday, 4 March, 2011
Lake Delton
Milwaukee
Montello
Portage
Spooner
Wausau

Saturday, 5 March, 2011
Burlington
Columbus
Solon Springs

…and of course MADISON! More big protests likely on Saturday!

100,000 people showed up to rally against the GOP in Madison Saturday (John Hart, State Journal, via Madison Capitol Times)

After a weekend of protests that spread through all 50 states, the numbers continue to rise as rallies continue. The protests in Ohio are growing quite large as well. More that 20,000 people rallied in Columbus on Monday, protesting more Koch-supported union-busting Tea Party legislation passing through the legislature there.

One hiccup did occur as Governor Walker refused to allow protesters into the State Capitol Monday, though he was hit with a restraining order by a Dane Country judget. In addition, police refused to enforce the Governor’s order to clear the building, arguing that they “are not the Palace Guard”. It is public relations like these that explain why more than one million Wisconsinites are willing to sign a petition for Scott Walker’s recall. That is about 1 in 4 voters in the state asking for his recall, and that is only after one week.

Walker’s political future may be doomed, but he plans to continue to do damage before he leaves. The Governor, who was ousted from Marquette University for cheating while still only garnering a 2.4 GPA, is gutting the Wisconsin state educational system with cuts of up to $900 million in aid to schools. Meanwhile, the damage continues to build. Restaurants are leaving the Wisconsin Restaurant Association for its support of the Walker Budget “Repair” Bill.

As the national assault on education continues, including the Detroit school districts packing up to 60 pupils per classroom and all of the Providence teachers being fired in one swoop, more and more evidence of criminality and conspiracy begin to arise.

The Media are doing their part to aid Governor Walker’s disinformation program. Fox “News” has once again been caught lying,
when it turns out that a reporter who claimed to be punched by a protester – well, was not punched by a protester. They have been shouted down by protesters to the tune of “Fox News Lies” (because it does), but there has been no violence directed toward them. Fox’s response to “Fox News Lies” has been to argue that the protesters have a lot of “vitriol toward the media” and that the protesters want to shut down communication. Watch the link to see the worst, most dishonest reporting ever. Good Grief.

But Fox News is not the only complicit new organization helping the Tea Party out. The New York Times has once again taken to burying the lead. Oh, sure the real news is right there – on page 23 – but you have to get past the misleading headlines first. Keith Olbermann, now of Fok News, has exposed a piece in which a “regular union guy” from Janesville, WI argued against the teachers’ right to collectively bargain. Well, it turns out that the New York Times failed to report that the “regular union guy” was not actually a member of a union, the plant he supposedly worked for has been closed for years, and they misspelled his name. Oops.

Word is slowly getting out that Minnesota, with a bigger biennial budget deficit than Wisconsin, is closing its gap by taxing the rich. Wisconsin should do the same, since the wealthy and corporations in Wisconsin actually pay lower taxes than their fair share. And if those other companies are like Koch Industries, they have gotten rich by demanding bailouts and robbing from the states anyway.

The cyber-activist group, Anonymous, is also getting involved. They have taken down the Americans for Prosperity website as their first attack on a Koch-run organization. They say:

“[i]t has come to our attention that the brother, David and Charles Koch- the billionaire owners of Koch Industries-have long attempted to usurp American Democracy. Their actions to undermine the legitimate political process in Wisconsin are the final straw. Starting today we fight back.”

Only one of these insecure blowhards finished college. Guess who - the answer is in the article! (News/WireImage/AP, via NY Daily News)

Oh Fox News, how you do love to play into the fears and insecurities of your viewers. No network has done so much to blunt the minds of a nation as Roger Ailes’ operation that has been screaming for weeks about the idea that teachers and nurses might wish to be compensated fairly for the long hours they put in and the hard work that they do. It is a natural enmity, though. Teachers do, after all, try to inform the public, so Fox News would obviously see them as a threat to its own programming. It is such a violent threat that the mere mention of labor protests in the Middle East and Madison have cause Glenn Beck to warn us this is the sign of the coming Apocalypse! Seriously.

It is not difficult to find misinformation on Fox News. The general search technique involves checking to see whether lips are moving on the TV while the dial is set to Rupert Murdoch’s enterprise. Nor must one wait long for invective. Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity (all of whom but Bill O’Reilly flunked out of college) have all been decrying those “fat cat” teachers with their plump pension funds and their long hours for low pay. But most of all, they have been attacking the Wisconsin state employees unions.

BUT:

All four, Beck, O’Reilly, Limbaugh and Hannity, are members of the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA), a union that is affiliated with the AFL-CIO.

So these blowhards have been frothing about unions and workers rights while enjoying all of the benefits of union membership themselves. It is amazing that anyone would be so willing to listen to these hypocrites.

Nearly 100,000 people rallied in Madison Saturday (AP via Huffington Post)

The Events

A HUGE rally took place on Saturday in Madison, Wisconsin as unions continue to fight against the elimination of their collective bargaining rights. It was the largest demonstration since Governor Walker initiated his proposal, with up to 100,000 protesters and no end in sight. Other protests continued across all 50 states as well Saturday in solidarity with the state employees in Wisconsin.

The Distraction

Despite the huge numbers of people involved in every state, the corporate media has seen fit to bury the lead by focusing on labor protests in other countries, Libya in particular, without mentioning that they are in fact being driven by labor. When was the last time that you have heard about demonstrations continuing in Egypt? They are still going on. Once the military junta took over, the American press essentially said, “Oh, look! They have democracy now and everything will be ok!” (Glenn Beck excepted, of course.) They ignore that now that the protesters have gotten some reforms and are working on a route to democracy, they are still in Tahrir Square arguing for better working conditions and wages and that is apparently making the Egyptian army a bit impatient.

But all eyes were on far off Libya Sunday, where it is easier now to declare the initially peaceful demonstrators as “opposition forces” because they have been forced to arm themselves to prevent their own extermination. After arming themselves, they have been pigeonholed into a different commonly used media meme: The old labor and democracy demonstrations are now an ‘uprising’.

Koch Strategy

Burying the lead is a tried and true anti-democratic tactic that is used by entrenched media in order to help diffuse trouble for authorities. Despite that 50,000 people protested across the country and that 100,000 people protested within Madison itself and countless thousands of others across Wisconsin this weekend, CNN, the New York Times, CBS, ABC and NBC are under-reporting the events. Fox News is mischaracterizing teachers and nurses as violent and greedy fat cats.

In order to understand why, just consider when was the last time that you saw either a Dixie Cup or a Georgia Pacific commercial on one of their stations. Sure, they will post Union ads, but when the crisis is over, they expect to continue getting ad revenue from Koch Industries. The Koch brothers have vowed to continue their fight, and the media is only one of their tactics in order to end the disagreement over their proposals for workers’ bargaining rights, health insurance and benefits.

The Koch brothers do have things roughly where they expected to be at the moment. The Governor submitted his ghost-written proposal, the Assembly has passed its version of the bill, sticking it to the guys who disagreed with it with the quick vote, but there is that nagging problem of those pesky Democratic Senators. You had better believe that the Koch brothers will buy a lot of ad time to pressure them into returning and Walker will ask the legislature to pass one piece of regressive legislation after another until they do. (However, Walker would do that even if the Dems were present in the Senate.)

The protests are a LOT larger than they expected, too.

The Tea Party, after all, was constructed just for this reason: A trojan horse, riding a wave of popular anger only to turn on the people who elected it in order to support the corporate interests of Koch Industries. The Kochs founded the Tea Party through its PACs and they have already used it to divide and conquer the public. Now, the public must try to divide and conquer the Koch minions like Walker and the Legislature. And the Koch brothers will do *anything* to get their way, so the strategy of the people must be broad-based as well.

How the public can win against the billionaires

Even though the media is beginning to side with the Kochs, their ad revenue would drop remarkably if their viewer/readership were to decrease. People who support the protesters can not expect to have their voices heard on the airwaves, but they should demand that it is. A lot of news today can be found on the internet and there are certainly a good number of places that ARE reporting the labor protests. The places that are supporting the labor movement include, but are not limited to:

The Madison Capitol Times
The Appleton Post Crescent
Harpers
Mother Jones
MSNBC (Rachel Maddow is awesome!)
The Real News Network
The Daily Kos
The Huffington Post
Truth Out
Buzzflash
…and others that I have not listed here, though you can find the links in my blogs. The Daily Show and the Colbert Report have really good fact-checking as well. All of the above news sources should be supported because without them, it would be much harder to get the word out.

The mainstream, mass-market media are not quite so helpful. This includes:
ABC News
CBS News
CNN
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (has published quite a few negative editorials)
The New York Times
The Washington Post
…and most of all:
Fox News who have portrayed the protesters as violent.

I have also heard anecdotally that a number of TV stations and local papers have been characterizing the demonstrations negatively. Remember, local news sources need to compete for thin resources and ad-buys are very important. This means that they can be swayed by big money, and the Kochs have plenty of it.

BUT…

All of that ad money will useless if people no longer watch their channels or read their papers. The people can have a lot of influence over programming when they organize. You will be surprised!

People who are marching are doing their part of the job. They are putting pressure on the Government and they are making their voices heard. To help them out, everyone who supports the protesters should do whatever they can to assist. Here are a few things that will take just a few minutes a day:

1. Call on the State Attorney General, J.B. Van Hollen, (608) 266-1221, to begin investigations into ethics violations by Governor Walker regarding the phone call, his tendency to give friends fat pay raises and his handling of the proposal. Call for investigations into the Republicans in the Legislature as well. Are they working with the Kochs too?

The Attorney General is a Republican as well, and the Governor has asked him to find ways to get the Democratic Senators to return. You should not expect the State Attorney General to do something right away, but if people call him, write letters to local newspapers and sign petitions calling for investigations, AND KEEP UP THE PRESSURE, then we may see either Hollen or Walker crack under that pressure and make more mistakes. Then they may accidentally reveal more corruption and links to the Kochs like the phone call did. If more information about either person is exposed, then they may be forced to part ties to defend themselves and then they may turn on each other. That is the goal: The Kochs know that pressure helps people make mistakes. Let’s use it on them.

2. Call for Federal Elections Commission investigations into the political operations of the Koch brothers. Are they donating money to their political organizations legally? We should know. Let us force the Koch brothers to spend their money to defend themselves legally. That means they will funnel less money to their own groups to mess with public elections.

3. Call or write your local Television Stations to ask for fair reporting of the protests. This is VERY important, as important as the protests themselves! Be sure to mention that you will migrate to other news sources if they do not begin treating teachers and care givers favorably. This link to Wikipedia has a list of all of Wisconsin’s TV Stations. Click on the station call sign and you will go to a Wikipedia page on that station that will have an address to the actual station website. You can find all appropriate contact information there.

4. If the media is not reporting, then you have to spread the word. Be fair, be accurate, and if you are not sure on details, describe what you know and what you do not. No one has all of the information, but we all try to do our best and we ask questions when we are uncertain about something. Spread the word via texting, Facebook, Twitter, email, telephone, smoke signals or even two paper cups on a string (not Dixie cups!). Form groups, networks and call lists have dinners, lunches and get togethers and let people know when you find something out.

5. Boycott companies and news sources that support the Tea Party, Scott Walker and the Budget “Repair” bill. I have already posted a partial list of companies with links (it is my most popular article so far) and I also have a post on Koch Industries and their related products for more information. The Kochs love the idea of free markets with no regulations. Let us use a market-based approach to show them what happens when they try to take away rights in ‘free markets’! They count on us to buy their products, so if they support taking away benefits and wage-bargaining rights, let us have an impact on their pocketbooks too.

6. Remember who supports the Budget ‘Repair’ Bill for the next elections! AND NEVER, EVER VOTE TEA PARTY AGAIN! That will be soon. Put this on your calendar: There is a State Supreme Court Election April 5th. Prosser is a part of the Court’s conservative majority. Vote Kloppenburg to reduce the power of the Tea Party in the court. VOTE!

7. RECALL Current Legislators and (eventually Governor Walker). The Daily Kos has provided links and information regarding the Republican Senators who can be recalled this year.

8. Discuss this with everyone – even your conservative relatives. This is a civil rights issue and billionaires are trying to take rights away from workers.

9. Wash, rinse, and repeat. This is a waiting game. It will take a while because billionaires have deep pockets. We essentially need to make it very expensive for them to meddle in the political system so that they stop doing it. You have two choices: Stick it out for the long haul and win OR the Kochs get their way and everyone will eventually have an impact to their livelihoods (especially the Tea Partiers themselves).

Remember, the more organized the public is, the easier it will be to get rid of Walker, the Kochs and their cronies. Everyone who supports the state employees should help because once the Kochs take care of them, they will come after the next group. They are all about power and they are working hard to take it all for themselves, so you have to work hard as well to keep your rights.

There are more of us than them. Public opinion strongly favors the workers. Tell other people you know about how they can help. We can do this and we are all in it together.

David Koch (New Yorker)

In the aftermath of Wisconsin Governor’s phone call with a David Koch impersonator, we now know that Scott Walker is a puppet. The Koch’s have purchased his election, with a combination of both direct funding and indirect funding through the Kochs’ vast network of right-wing organizations. We can only speculate on the Kochs’ true motivations, but if the talking points listed on their think tank websites give any indication, it involves a dismantling and part and parcel sale of government assets to private interests as well as an assault on environmental regulations. The New Yorker published an excellent article about the Koch Brothers last August. This exposé is quite illuminating in that it brings up a number of issues, including the roots of their interest in the Libertarian movement, how they gained political influence, and how they have now been able to buy elections across the country.

New Yorker: Covert Operations, The billionaire brothers who are waging a war against Obama

Naomi Klein (TED)

Literature is filled with strange tales of monsters lurking in the woods or other elements and the lengths to which lost travelers must go in order to survive in the vast, deep wilderness. Wildlife in these stories is as plentiful as it is dangerous. Bears, wolves and large cats bound into the man versus nature conflict whenever the unsuspecting wayfarer’s attention and strength are at an ebb. Living off the land in a foreign environment, without the resources and safety of the village are portrayed as an existential test of strength, tenacity and pluck against the unknown dangers of the gigantic world beyond the meadows in the immediate vicinity of the hero(ine)’s hamlet.

"The Voyage of Life - Childhood" by Thomas Cole (1842) (National Gallery of Art, via Wikipedia)

The narrative was first developed by the enscription of Epic of Gilgamesh into clay cuneiform tablets around 2600 BCE, though it is more famously rendered in Homer’s relatively recent 800 BCE Odyssey. Somehow this narrative has survived despite the passage of nearly a thousand generations of people over forty-seven centuries without regard to the massive changes in technology and the scale of human populations since those times. The first paragraph of the Odyssey, as translated by Samuel Butler begins:

Tell me, O muse, of that ingenious hero who travelled far and wide after he had sacked the famous town of Troy. Many cities did he visit, and many were the nations with whose manners and customs he was acquainted; moreover he suffered much by sea while trying to save his own life and bring his men safely home

The world population never exceeded 15 million people before the development of agriculture in northern Africa by ~ 12,000BCE. That is 25% less than the population of the New York Metro Area today. The world population has increased fully 460 times that value in the intervening years. There were only about 450 million people by the time that Little Red Riding Hood was first told in the 14th century CE.

Energy use per person was nil at the time of Gilgamesh but now average power consumption among 300 million Americans is 12,000W per person, roughly twice that of the average Western European, nine times that of the average Chinese person and twelve times that of the average Indian. But as 2.4 billion Chinese and Indians seek a better life, we risk the prospect of requiring 11 America-equivalents of power consumption within 30 years. The world’s biome is already fracturing at the current capacity of 5 America-equivalents and in all honesty, it can not sustain even one for the long term.

The solution is simple: Convert to wind and solar power and decetralize consumption in society. It is possible and we can do it. The investment would be no more than that which created the vast petroleum network we use to fill our cars every day. But because we would no longer need to purchase power, this is a tremendous problem for petrochemical companies who have worked with the Tea Party to introduce legislation to eliminate wind power in Montana and soon Wisconsin and other states. This means that as we continue to consume oil, we take greater and greater risks with our environment. We are told that everything will be ok – do not worry about climate change. Climate has changed before! Stay the course!

Google Maps image of Tar Sand Extraction near Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada (Google Maps)

Disappointingly, the major news media, who display big oil advertisements have obfuscated the issue, it is simpley the nature of a for profit institution to seek profit over truth. These companies do not want change because they are doing well enough as it is and their executives are incredibly wealthy. CEOs will always be able to afford food, even when no one else can. Their advertising is like the veritable wolf in grandma’s garb as Little Red Riding Hood walks into the house with butter and cakes.

Still, Environmental degradation is plainly visible if we simply pay attention. The BP Oil Disaster is a clear and ominous sign and another is much less widely known – the Alberta Tar (Oil) Sands. The U.S. has reduced its consumption of oil from the Middle East, but it now consumes far dirtier oil (it creates 3x the carbon dioxide of normal oil in production and use) and we are stripping bare vast regions of Alberta’s Boreal Forest. The impact can be seen from space. Gray area in the Google Map Image are current extraction sites near Fort McMurray. The small brown rectangles you see surrounded by green forest regions that are being logged before becoming new strip mines.

Picking up from where we left off in the first paragraph of Odyssey:

but do what he might he could not save his men, for they perished through their own sheer folly in eating the cattle of the Sun-god Hyperion; so the god prevented them from ever reaching home. Tell me, too, about all these things, O daughter of Jove, from whatsoever source you may know them.

Alberta Aerial view of tar sands extraction in Alberta (Garth Lenz)

We no longer live in the world of Little Red Riding Hood. We no longer fear the woods because they are small, fragile and finite. They do not house predators anymore. Large animals that are not livestock have been allowed to remain only in a few reservations around the world that cover a small fraction of the Earth’s surface. Humans have taken over and we are now a geological force. It can be seen in the form of the road grid on any plane flight, it can be seen in the images of tar sands extraction and it can be seen in the Gulf of Mexico. There are few expansive horizons and they are no longer threatening. We have reached a new physical limit in which we do have a profound effect on our surroundings. That means that we have new responsibilities to care for the Earth if we wish to keep it as a home: We need to change the narrative.

There is one thing that we should keep: Ulysses was the only member of his crew that returned home. Homer makes it abundantly clear that it was due to his creativity, his leadership, and his foresight that he found his way back to Ithaca. If you read Odyssey carefully, you will find that while his crew were staging a man vs. nature drama, Ulysses was primarily concerned with the part about man vs. self – especially when traveling near the Sirens.

Please watch this excellent and informative talk on risk and the environment by Naomi Klein as part of the TED lecture series.

References
I am using Wikipedia simply to illustrate how easy it is to find this information. Other resources include governmental regulatory websites, newspapers, blogs, magazines, and published studies.
Wikipedia: Current Energy Use
Wikipedia: World Population
Wikipedia: Tar Sands

In 2009, Bill Moyers held a wonderful interview with Howard Zinn, a short time before Zinn’s death. The interview discusses Zinn’s recent work – a History Channel documentary special based on his A People’s History of the United States. The interview includes a few very powerful clips showing just how normal men and women changed the course of history. The words of the people in the documentary are read by poets poets and actors, including Matt Damon (who was Zinn’s neighbor in Boston) and Marissa Tomei.

You must see Marissa Tomei read the words of Genora Dollinger, the woman who organized the “Women of Flint”, the Women’s Emergency Brigade. That scene can be found about half-way through Part 1.

Howard Zinn on Moyers Journal (1/3) (Moyers Journal, via YouTube)

Howard Zinn on Moyers Journal (2/3) (Moyers Journal, via YouTube)

Howard Zinn on Moyers Journal (3/3) (Moyers Journal, via YouTube)

Clarence and Virginia Thomas (credits in photo)

It is now well known that the Governor of Wisconsin has made to demonize teachers and care givers while making the decision to lower their living standards rather than to govern in a way that lifts the living standards of everyone. For those of you who are wondering how the state reached this predicament, we would need to go back to the foundation of the Tea Party with the help of the Koch Brothers and Dick Armey.

But that would not be the entire story because the Tea Party needed a little more help to get off the ground. The reason is not that the Tea Party had trouble finding funding because the Koch Brothers have billions. Rather, the trouble was that the Tea Party could not use that money to legally fund campaigns because of the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Law. So the Koch Brothers,
who hold a gathering of conservative operatives every year, invited Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia to their soirée in 2009.

Well, it just so happened that the Supreme Court was hearing a case around that time, Citizen’s United vs. Federal Election Commission and by an amazing coincidence, that case just happened to deal with campaign finance law! When the Supreme Court Ruling on the case came out, it became clear that it was a bonanza for Corporations. Equating corporate money to “free speech” and a corporation to a person, the majority opinion, written in part by both Scalia and Thomas, ruled that companies could anonymously donate as much money as they wanted to any political candidate. In short, the decision opened the floodgates for corporate money in elections, which was already widely perceived to be a problem – even under McCain-Feingold.

The decision was strongly repudiated by lawyers, elections officials, lawmakers and voting rights advocates alike. In his dissenting opinion, Justice Stevens sharply rebuked the decision:

At bottom, the Court’s opinion is thus a rejection of the common sense of the American people, who have recognized a need to prevent corporations from undermining self government since the founding, and who have fought against the distinctive corrupting potential of corporate electioneering since the days of Theodore Roosevelt. It is a strange time to repudiate that common sense. While American democracy is imperfect, few outside the majority of this Court would have thought its flaws included a dearth of corporate money in politics.

The result of this decision was a resounding victory for Republicans across the country. A huge influx of corporate cash, much of it from unknown donors. Some funds from foreign sources may have been funneled (read: laundered) through the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. All of this meant a huge cash disadvantage for Democrats around the country.

The corporate money fueled misinformation and attack ads everywhere. It funded smear campaigns by the Chamber of Commerce, who hired a consultant to develop a strategy of hacking Union computer systems, planting false documents and alerting authorities after a false-leak to the “accounting fraud” information they “learned” about their adversaries. But they also set up malware and virus attacks on liberal groups. They also used the campaigns to try to force public policy to accept the outsourcing of jobs that their constituents have profitted heavily from.

These illegal operations took their toll. Russ Feingold, who had spent his career on improving the electoral process and eliminating untoward corporate influence also fell victim as Tea Party candidates, with coffers filled by the Koch Brothers won elections everywhere.
Corporate contributions reached a record $220 million in 2010, effectively throwing the same amount of support as a whole political party behind pro-corporate Republicans. Their agenda was and is about maintaining a corporate stranglehold on elections so that the government becomes a source of funding for entrenched and politically connected companies. Any funding on social programs is therefore inefficient to their ends and must be stopped. That includes Social Security, Medicare, Unemployment, you name it.

It is *only* through this lens that you can understand why Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker would create a budget deficit to precipitate a false crisis while refusing to raise taxes by $25 per person per year to solve the problem (that is all it would take). The Koch Brothers do not want to pay taxes and they and their news commentators such as Glenn Beck prey on the unassuming sense of fairness of normal people to convince them that raising taxes on the wealthy would be tantamount to theft. This is despite the fact that the world’s third richest man, Warren Buffett, publicly stated that it was wrong for him to pay a lower tax rate than his middle-class secretary. Buffett is diametrically opposed to the Kochs on the taxation issue: Warren Buffett and Bill Gates want to pay more taxes and they think other wealthy people should do the same in order to preserve democracy in the country.

Well, it turns out that this is not even the whole story yet. Clarence Thomas’ wife, Virginia, was a long-time lobbyist for the Heritage Foundation. And the Heritage Foundation was founded by the Koch Brothers! Even more: Clarence Thomas has not reported his wife’s nearly $700,000 per year income on their joint tax filings for several years, likely due to the fact that it is against the Supreme Court Code of Conduct for a Justice to engage in fundraising activities of any sort.

It gets even better: The group Citizens United spent over $100,000 on ads that supported his candidacy for the Supreme Court Bench! His wife also began two groups, Liberty Central and Liberty Consulting, which have profited from the Citizens United Ruling! Hence, Thomas has failed to report several conflicts of interest from which he was required to recuse himself. It may therefore be possible to vacate the Citizens United decision with the help of the Justice Department.

What kind of Justice is Clarence Thomas? Despite the fact that he has not asked a single question in hearings for 5 years now. (Sonja Sotomayor famously asked more questions on her first day of court than Thomas had in his entire time on the bench.) When it came out that Thomas had hidden his ethics violations with tax evasion, he claimed that he made a mistake on his tax forms because did not understand the corresponding tax law. So there you go – he is either corrupt or incompetent or both.

The progressive group, Common Cause is calling for an investigation of Justice Thomas and has filed a bar complaint with the Justice Department. If guilty could conceivably be impeached, though it would only be the second time in U.S. history in which a Supreme Court Justice faced impeachment.

On a lighter note, here is Stephen Colbert’s take on Clarence Thomas’ finances. Enjoy!

Koch Industries (Green Market)

Koch Industries is a private company, the second largest one in the U.S. behind Cargill, and it has revenues on the order of $100 billion per year. Yet you may not have heard of the company because it keeps a rather low profile. Why might this be, you ask? Here is a rundown of the industries they are involved in: Petrochemicals, mining, lumber, fertilizers and distribution (trucking) and several others. You see, Koch Industries is one of the largest, most heavily polluting companies in the world and it is completely wedded to the use of fossil fuels.

According to Wikipedia, their subsidiaries include:

Georgia-Pacific paper and pulp company, maker of Brawny paper towels, Angel Soft toilet paper, Mardi Gras napkins and towels and Quilted Northern toilet paper.

Invista, a polymer and fibers company that makes Stainmaster carpet, and Lycra fiber, among other products.

Koch Pipeline Company LP, that owns and operates 4,000 miles of pipeline used to transport oil, natural gas liquids and chemicals.

Flint Hill Resources LP, that operates oil refineries in six states.

Koch Fertilizer, LLC, owns or has interests in fertilizer plants the United States, Canada, Trinidad and Tobago, Venezuela, and Italy, among others. In October 2010, a plant in Venezuela was nationalized by the government.

The company was founded by Fred C. Koch in 1940 and his sons, Charles G. Koch and David H. Koch now run the company and they are both billionaires. The family has long been very politically active. Fred Koch was a huge ultra-right-wing libertarian and he was an original member of the John Birch Society (now headquartered in Grand Chute, Wisconsin), which worked on things like distributing flyers entitled “What’s Wrong With Civil Rights?” in which it used Red Scare tactics to attempt to convince people that the 1960s Civil Rights Movement was, you know, a bad and scary thing. They said it would lead to Communists infiltrating the highest levels of government. Sound familiar? They also argued against the Civil Rights Act because they claimed that it violated the Tenth Amendment (essentially state’s rights) and that it should be countered by Nullification. So that was the father and the sons have sprouted from the same roots.

Owning a heavily polluting company with a poor record on labor, the Koch Brothers would be forced to pay a few billion dollars in carbon taxes if a carbon regulation mechanism were adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency. As a result, they seek to end the EPA, which regulates companies through the Clean Air and Clean Water acts, among other regulations.

Why do we have the EPA? So that the sky over our cities does not look like this one did circa 1970. It was also because the Cuyahoga River started on fire a few times in Cleveland by the 1960s. Rivers, normally constituted of water are not typically meant to burn.

Anyway, the Koch Brothers have found that it is cheaper for them to wreck the American political system than it is to clean up their companies or to seek to improve labor standards. By simply doling out a few hundred million dollars to PACs and political organizations that intend to create “smaller government”. Otherwise, they would have to pay billions to convert to more sustainable practices. Why do they like smaller government? Because governments that do not have much funding can not regulate wealthy billionaires with highly polluting companies.

The Koch Brothers also hate paying the taxes that they can easily afford. So the Koch Brothers are very active in politics these days. Below is a list of the conservative foundations and political organizations that they have founded, that they fund, and that they run. Each of these organizations hires people to go onto cable TV to misinform the public. If you see a pundit on cable news from one of these groups, you know that they are trying to convince you to agree to something that is bad for you. They talk about “small government”, they spread the lie that Climate Change is not real, to misinform the public on health care by shouting “Death Panels!”, and try to convince people that they should allow Social Security to be handled by the same banks that should have gone bankrupt two years ago, and the list goes on and on.

Americans for Prosperity (David Koch is Chairman of the Board of Trustees, this organization spent $40 million on Tea Party candidates including Scott Walker. They also paid people to shout down Congressional Representatives who were trying to talk about health care reform with their constituents.)

Patients United (Fought against a single-payer health care system)

Citizens for a Sound Economy (Co-founded by D. Koch and funded with millions for activities including campaigns in the 1980s that argued that acid rain was a hoax – this spun off to form Citizens for the Environment)

Cato Institute (The Kochs founded it – this organization intends to privatize Social Security, they oppose the Kyoto Protocol, and claim Climate Change is a hoax)

Federalist Society (The Kochs are key donors for this organization which wants to see an “originalist constitution” – remember the original constitution did not allow women’s suffrage and african americans were slaves, but most of all they like Supreme Court Rulings that claim big companies are people like you and me.)

Mercatus Center (This group believes that truckers should not have limited hours behind the wheel, nor should drinking water have EPA-regulated arsenic limits, and they did not believe the US government should have cleaned up the Gulf Coast after Hurricane Katrina)

Institute for Humane Studies (They think government should not regulate the environment and that private companies can police themselves)

Institute for Justice (They support originalist judges and seek greater rights for private companies)

Alexis de Tocqueville Institution (Fights taxes on corporations, denies climate change, and promotes military spending by the U.S. government)

Institute for Energy Research (Seeks to create a privatized, free market and unregulated energy system in the U.S. they also support off-shore oil drilling)

Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment (Another group that believes that big corporations can protect the environment on their own, free of regulations that make them do it)

Heritage Foundation (A group that sought to halt nuclear nonproliferation, supports the invasion of Afghanistan, Chile and Haiti, promotes war profiteering, and seeks the privatization of public infrastructure and entitlement programs, they do not like unions either, but they love free, unregulated markets.)

Manhattan Institute (Promotes free-market (unregulated and private) solutions to the economy, energy, education and health care)

George C. Marshall Institute (A conservative think tank – they supported the Star Wars defense initiative, deny climate change, denied acid rain and did not believe in the ozone hole)

Reason Foundation (They believe in free markets, no unions and commercial education)

American Enterprise Institute (They believe in privatized and unregulated everything, war profiteering, ending labor right, they deny global warming, seek to repeal environmental regulations, and for the kicker Dick Cheney is a trustee)

Aspen Institute (here, the Koch brothers wine and dine with politicians in person. After a meeting last year with Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, the two justices wrote an opinion for the Citizens United ruling giving companies the right to spend an unlimited amount of money on public elections. That money, funneled through the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Americans for Progress gave you all of the Tea Party candidates that are trying to break unions, privatize Social Security, deregulate Wall Street, defund the Department of Education, end the EPA and reinstitute child labor.)

You should do your best to boycott each of the above products and institutions. The only way to regain politcal influence for live, breathing human beings and to eliminate corporate control of elections is to make it more expensive for companies to mess with our political system. If a company supports policies that are bad for the public, the public should make them pay a high premium in the form of lost revenue. Good luck!

Sarah Palin (Wikipedia)

Anyone who has watched American TV during the past two decades should understand that the lies that are propagated by the corporate media are all around us. Whether the discussion be about health care, human rights, the environment or American foreign policy, the tenor of the national discussion in the corporate media always seems swing toward lunatic right wing assertions. Whether it be death panels, Obama’s birth certificate, climate change denial, claims that elementary school teachers are fat cats, privatization of public entitlements, anything mentioned about Ronald Reagan or the belief that free-market capitalism is self-sustaining and good for American workers, the lies consistently support the position of the advantaged by confusing and dividing the masses. But why are the people so taken by the strategy employed by corporate interests? The Buzzflash Blog recently posted an OpEd piece by Peter Michaelson, a privately practicing psychoanalytic psychotherapist from Michigan, who explains why:

Many of us experience anxious, inner turmoil when our beliefs are directly challenged by opposing ideas and beliefs (or, even more distressing, by facts). The emotional impact might be, “Who am I, who will I be, without my beliefs?”

Some individuals can feel a frightening cognitive dissonance, like a lost soul in existential panic, when confronted with facts that do not correspond with their belief system. To avoid this fear, they refuse unconsciously to assimilate the facts into their intelligence.

These are observations from a University of Michigan study, that is also discussed on alternet.org. The lead researcher from the study, Brendan Nyhan of the University of Michigan, puts it this way: “The general idea is that it’s absolutely threatening to admit you’re wrong.”

That is why it is possible for Fox News and the Republicans to convince their followers that a noble human virtue such as empathy is a source of injustice immediately after Obama criticized the Republicans for their lack of empathy on health care reform.

Luckily, there are still ways to convince some people to accept reality, though it does not work for everyone. Traumatic events such as job loss, health crisis and the like – all of which are promoted by right-wing policies – can serve to convince delusional minds that they have followed the wrong path. Ideally, however, one would hope there is a way to convince people of reality before they suffer the ill-effects of their illogic. Yet psychiatrist Scott Peck is quoted in the alternet article:

“Only a relative and fortunate few continue until the moment of death exploring the mystery of reality, ever enlarging and refining and redefining their understanding of the world and what is true.”

If this is true, there is only one other form of recourse, and that is to expose and discredit the sources of the misinformation using cognitive science as a guide before they have a chance to create more victims.

[blip.tv http://blip.tv/play/gdElgqSmaAI%5D

Laura Flanders of GRIT tv discusses the state of affairs in the U.S. as Tea Partiers begin ideological wars against the middle class.