Category: Media


A portion of the cover of Orwell's 1984 by Signet (NetCharles.com)

In George Orwell’s book 1984, the Memory Hole was chute, down which workers at the Ministry of Truth would throw old news articles, books and documents that contained evidence contrary to the current (and frequently changing) position of the Government. Articles, documents and books were rewritten so that the frequently changing positions of the Government had always been true in the eyes of the public. The chute led to an incinerator where old evidence was instantly destroyed.

Today’s widespread use of electronic media creates the very real possibility that if data archives were held by only a small number of individuals, they might be able to edit, revise, or delete documents to suit their interests. The effect would be the same as that of the Memory Hole in 1984: the new prevailing opinions of those individuals would always have been true and the evidence to the contrary could disappear without a trace.

The best defense against such a thing would be to ensure many people hold copies of the same documents on personal hard drives – especially when engaging in “cloud computing” whenever the “cloud” is controlled by a major corporation or the government.

Wikipedia: Memory Hole

Advertisements

Julian Assange (The News Update)

Terrorist, really?

Few people in the past year have sparked debate in the manner that Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, has. His organization has become well-known for publishing material that is leaked by anonymous whistleblowers that often show wrongdoing on the parts of governments and corporations around the world, though a good deal of its notoriety stems from the publication of the Iraq War Logs and its bringing to light actual U.S. military footage of a helicopter crew shooting reporters and civilians in Baghdad, a video that the group entitled “Collateral Murder”.

The release of documents pertaining to the U.S. military and the U.S. Department of State resulted in an outcry by conservatives across the country who claimed that Assange had hurt the national security of the United States and that he had exposed a number of U.S. military informants in Afghanistan, claims that Assange strongly denies. Fox News Correspondents and familiar Republican faces such as Mike Huckabee and Sarah Palin called Julian Assange a traitor, though he is actually Australian and therefore can not commit treason against the U.S., and they even went so far as to call for his assassination within days of the shooting of Gabriel Giffords in Arizona.

While calls for assassination rang out at Fox News, the rest of the American media played up the angle that WikiLeaks had damaged American national interests because it had published diplomatic cables that contained confidential and embarrassing information about foreign dignitaries and diplomats. The cables did certainly create a good deal of awkwardness at the State Department, but rather than focus on any specifics, the general treatment among the major networks was downright tabloid. For example, in this piece, ABC News focused on non-substantive comments in the cables that essentially resort to the level of name calling. And far from being hard hitting, ABC did not make a terribly strong case. From the piece, we find out that Libya’s Ghadafi is considered “wierd”. This could hardly be of any surprise, but we learn nothing of the real nuggets of information found in the documents from the ABC piece – a trend that you will see is quite prominent in American media.

The Administration’s Response – and from Corporate America

The reaction from the Obama Administration was rather strong. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton condemned the release of the diplomatic cables. Their release certainly made her job difficult. But did the release of the cables truly affect the relations between the U.S. and other countries to the degree that she has claimed? For her part, Julian Assange did suggest that Secretarty Clinton should resign, “if it can be shown that she was responsible ordering U.S. diplomatic figures to engage in espionage in the United Nations.” (Go to 2:20 in the video for the quote.) Unfortunately, most of the American press reported that with the headline to the effect: Assange: Clinton Should Resign, ignoring a rather important subjunctive clause, but also skillfully avoiding the reasoning behind Assange’s statement. Mr. Assange made that statement with the revelation from his group that the U.S. State Department had begun a program to try to gain information about foreign dignitaries by the use of biometrics and espionage. If the State Department is trying to spy on other leaders, suddenly the peaceful and “candid discussions” that Secretary Clinton mentioned in the ABC News video would certainly take a very different tone, but once again, there is no information in the ABC report about these potentially unethical clandestine actions by the State Department.

Presidential Candidate Obama discusses open government in 2008 (Glass Booth.org, via YouTube)

President Obama campaigned in part on the notion of openness in the Federal Government. Obama had also signed whistleblower protections early during his presidency. One bill strengthened whistleblower protections for the employees of companies contracting with the Federal Government and he strengthened whistleblower rights in the recently-passed Food Safety Act. Yet, despite this early support for openness in government, President Obama was now in the rather uncomfortable position that he was in charge of the organization losing leaked information.

Despite the discomfort, the White House Press Secretary, Robert Gibbs, challenged Fox News by saying that the White House is not afraid of one guy with a laptop. He also went on to say that those who leaked information are subject to a Department of Justice criminal investigation as well. But while president Obama claimed to be in support of an open, censorship-free internet after the Diplomatic Cables release, it was quite clear that his Justice Department was in fact strongly pursuing an investigation into the the potential for ties between Julian Assange and the alleged leaker, Private Bradley Manning.

President Obama discusses open internet in December, 2010 (Stop the War Coalitino, via YouTube)

It was around that time in early December, 2010, that Swedish allegations of “sex by surprise”, not rape as reported by the American media, forced Assange to remain in place in Britain, even serving some time in solitary confinement until his bond was secured. He remains without charge from Sweden, though he has been fighting his extradition to Sweden out of concern that he would be extradited again to the United States. It was also made public that one of the women who had accused Assange of rape was actually tied to the CIA. WikiLeaks also found it difficult to receive donations because companies like PayPal, Visa and Mastercard cut off services to WikiLeaks, though the latter two do allow donations to the KKK! It is strongly suspected that the Obama Administration was partially responsible for convincing those companies to cut their financial ties to WikiLeaks.

One company, VISA, did hire a firm to investigate WikiLeaks to determine whether it could find any wrongdoing by the group and found none. VISA has yet to allow donations to flow back to WikiLeaks, despite the findings having come out roughly three months ago.

Assange in his own words

So who is this Julian Assange? Is he the terrorist described by Fox News? The guy who is hurting American national security like the U.S. mainstream press argues? Is he a supporter of free speech and open government?

To this point we have heard from virtually everyone but Julian Assange himself. But to fully understand his comments, we can not confine ourselves to the American mass media. First, let us take a look at a speech that he gave to the Oslo Freedom Forum in 2010.

Julian Assange speaks at the Oslo Freedom Forum, April 2010 (Oslo Freedom Forum, via YouTube)

In that speech, Assange describes how his organization tries not to know the names of the whistleblowers in order to protect itself as well as the whistleblowers. WikiLeaks tries to protect whistleblowers as much as possible, while using freedom of speech laws around the world to their maximum extent to ensure that the leaked information remains public and protected from attempts to shut websites down.

The stakes are quite high. After minute 5:15 in the Oslo Speech, Assange mentions the salient point that with today’s electronic media, the information repositories of the West are becoming concentrated in fewer hands. While it was once true that people could see missing pages in book in Soviet Libraries, it is now possible to remove websites without a trace. This is a very well-thought out position on transparency of information in the electronic era. There have already been examples, as Assange continues, in which stories of scandals have slipped into the Orwellian “memory hole”. The protection of information against consolidated control is to make it public and to ensure that thousands of copies of that information can be found across the internet. By making information public, WikiLeaks says that it provides the tools that the public needs in order to hold its leaders accountable for their actions.

Julian Assange speaks at TED, July 2010 (TED, via YouTube)

In another speech at TED, Assange discusses some of the types of documents that WikiLeaks has released to the public, including the release of Collateral Murder (around 5:30). At one point, Assange makes a very intriguing statement, “Capable and generous men do not create victims, they nurture people.” This is hardly a statement by the vindictive radical of Fox News’ imaginings.

Listen to Assange discuss his own reaction to the video in the following video from an interview conducted by Al Jazeera. At not point does Assange attempt to hyperbolize what can be seen on the video screen.

Julian Assange discusses 'Collateral Murder' (Al Jazeera, via YouTube)

The Al Jazeera interview also includes commentary by Ivan Eland, a national security analyst from the Cato Institute (hardly an anti-military institution). Eland describes the actions from the lens of the military while Assange describes the situation from the perspective of the victims. Al Jazeera does a great job of showing similarities and dissonances between the two perspectives to give the viewer a rather impressive perspective of the incident in which American helicopter pilots gunned down a number of innocent bystanders. This is not the type of portrayal of the U.S. military that one sees in the United States. Rather, a better example of American portayal can be seen here:

Wolf Blitzer reports on 'Collateral Murder' (CNN, via YouTube)

CNN did not show the entire video. They did not mention that the “weapons” described by the helicopter pilots were actually cameras, but they did stop just before the helicopter opened fire and just after the letters “RPG” appear on the screen. The net effect of this editing is to give the viewer the impression that the helicopter pilots were in the right by defending themselves against a potential rocket propelled grenade attack. Wolf then cuts to Barbara Starr, CNN’s Pentagon correspondent, who touts the Pentagon’s line without question: That the people had been investigated and that no fault was found. Yet Starr never describes the extent of the investigation, nor does she comment on the rest of the video. She also propagates the lie that other troops were attacked nearby that day. Finally, the journalist Starr rather callously mentions that the deaths of these journalists can simply be added to the death toll of 129 to that point in the Iraq War.

So CNN all but asks the viewer not to worry, nothing to see here people… just journalists dying despite the fact that journalists are given legal protections even in war zones – protections that are never mentioned despite the large number of deaths of journalists by the U.S. military. That is the American mainstream media in a nutshell. When the need for information and transparency is palpable, CNN obscured the facts in order to provide the Pentagon a blanket of plausible deniability. Later, CNN posted an article online entitled “Secretive website WikiLeaks may be posting more U.S. military video”, a clear effort to discredit WikiLeaks without bringing any new information to the fore.

This is not to say that high-ranking officials should necessarily be charged with corruption because of the actions of much lower-ranking pilots. Nor does Assange make that case. However, the incident may certainly warrant a review of the specific ways in which loose rules of engagement may have resulted in the deaths of a number of innocent people that way. Perhaps there is a way to address civilian deaths that will heighten the safety for troops and civilians alike – neither we nor the Pentagon will know unless the matter is investigated and that will not happen unless there is public pressure to do so.

The added benefit for political leaders may be that after having encountered a number of incidents in which mistakes were made, the public may develop a more nuanced view regarding the myriad ways in which such unfortunate instances could happen. That may mean that the public could better differentiate between instances in which an undesirable outcome resulted from good-faith efforts, versus cases of corruption. The public would likely be more forgiving in the former cases, which could give politicians more latitude in their efforts to improve conditions at home as well. That is why there is a need to bring details about events like these to light.

More on the media perception of Assange

After the release of Collateral Murder and the release of Iraq and Afghanistan War documents, the line in the media became the accusation that Julian Assange and WIkiLeaks were attempting to attack U.S. national security. That is a charge that Julian Assange deftly handles here in an interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper.

Anderson Cooper interviews Julian Assange (CNN, via YouTube)

After the release of the American diplomatic cables, Julian Assange was of course charged with sex crimes in Sweden and the timing is clearly suspicious. The American press wasted no time in ensuring that future interviews with Assange were about him rather than the information that he was attempting to present.

Increasingly, the theme in American media was about Julian Assange himself. For example, an October, 2010 interview with CNN avoided the contents of WikiLeaks releases, but rather focussed on Julian Assange’s personality and the early reports of allegations of rape. This led to Assange walking out of the interview while he was attempting to steer the interview back toward the contents of WikiLeaks’ latest document release.

A short time later, Assange related to Larry King why he had walked out of the interview, namely to ensure that media attention remains on the deaths of innocent victims during a time of war. When Daniel Ellsberg (the leaker of the Pentagon Papers) calls for an investigation over the matters that WikiLeaks released, Larry King called an end to the segment:

Larry King interviews Julian Assange and Daniel Ellsberg (CNN, via YouTube)

In January, CBS’ 60 Minutes did an interview with Assange in Britain at the location of his house arrest. You will find the entire interview is chock full of references to the “mysterious” “strange” or “enigmatic” Assange – but you will hear very few details regarding the actual contents of WikiLeaks releases. Interviewer Steve Kroft asks questions that essentially carry water for the Pentagon throughout the interview. Assange actually instructs Kroft on a number of points regarding the practice of journalism in Part I, as well as reminding Kroft of the importance of America’s First Amendment in his own work. Part II of the interview covers Assange’s past, with descriptions of his “frequently uprooted” childhood and his hacking activities. There are a number of great exchanges where Assange is able to directly respond to Pentagon and State Department accusations and he does it quite well.

60 Part I: Minutes interviews Julian Assange (CBS News)

Part II: 60 Minutes interviews Julian Assange (CBS News)

Unfortunately, 60 Minutes played the “enigmatic” angle heavily during its normal showtime, but Steve Kroft and the production staff do discuss (in rather surprising contrast) how they perceived Assange to be rather genuine in his beliefs and actions during their own reflections on 60 Minutes Overtime. And the disappointing dearth of information regarding WikiLeaks’ revelations is described in detail in an article by David Swanson.

How stark is the American media portrayal of Julian Assange? Thanks to the wonderful world of the internet, it is possible to directly compare American interviews such as those by CBS and CNN with interviews by reporters from the Netherlands and Australia. Viewing the last two sample videos and the Al Jazeera interview earlier shows American just what they have been missing: A press that seeks to inform the public rather than to cover up excesses by the U.S. Government.

Without such transparency as that displayed by international news sources, it is unlikely that citizens of the United states will be able to ensure the safety of their own family members who are sent into harm’s way from the excesses of a national security state that creates an environment in which otherwise well-intentioned soldiers can become excited for the next kill. How much less violence might there have been in Iraq and how many fewer people – Iraqis and Americans alike – if the people in Iraq were not subject to such unfair rules of operation that ‘shoot first and ask questions later’ should be the rule of the day? That is, after all, what WikiLeaks claims to do: To provide the transparency required for citizens to make informed decisions on their own.

Now that you have finally seen the major players give their cases in their own words, you can finally decide for yourself: Is Julian Assange truly an ideological terrorist acting to destroy the United States, or is he facing attacks by the same people who profit from unceasing wars whose current estates are now jeopardized by WikiLeaks, or is there some other combination of factors taking place? How would one even be able to consider all of the possibilities, given American mainstream reporting alone? Now that you have seen actual details and reporting, you have the ability to decide for yourself.

Mosaic: "Justice" from the Wisconsin State Capitol (rbw)

Last February 17th, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker claimed that he had received over 8,000 emails regarding his proposal to attack unions in his Budget “Repair” Bill. He also claimed that most of the emails were in favor of his proposal. By the 18th, he claimed to have received over 19,000 emails. The Madison Isthmus, curious about his claims, filed a Freedom of Information Act request to read through the emails. Yet surprisingly, the Governor was not eager to divulge the level of support he had received for his proposals. After Walker’s office failed to respond to the Freedom of Information Act request (a violation of federal law), the Isthmus sued for access to the emails. Yesterday, the Isthmus announced a settlement for the lawsuit. It is one-sided because Walker did not want to go to court for a breech of federal law. The settlement indicates that Scott Walker will release the emails to the Isthmus by Tuesday, March 22 and that the governor’s office will also cover all legal costs. Soon, we will be able to see just how much support he really received.

Hearst's New York Journal front page giving a biased, pro-war account of the explosion on the U.S.S. Maine (Wikipedia)

By the end of the 19th century, Cuba had long been seen as a potential acquisition for the expanding United States. By the 1860s, Cuba was importing many of their goods from the United States, who purchased most of the sugar that the island produced. Several attempts to purchase the island from Spain were aborted due to shifting political fortunes within the U.S. Large American companies had a significant financial interest in lowering import tariffs on the sugar, while at the same time the mindset of “Manifest Destiny” – the drive to expand the U.S. throughout the Western Hemisphere – was beginning to take hold.

Enter the media. Beginning in the 1890s, William Randolph Hearst, Joseph Pullitzer, and other members of the media began to conjure and over-report ‘attrocities’ that they claimed had been perpetrated by the Spanish Empire, which was now in steep decline. During this time, Hearst’s New York Journal and Pullitzer’s New York World entered into a fight for readership. They began to employ strategies to gain readership that would later be called “Yellow Journalism”. This included publishing morality plays, showing “nudity” (or the closest Victorian equivalent), and sensational political articles about sometimes fabricated scandals.

During the 1890s, Cuba began a struggle for independence against Spain. Hearst and others could see the potential for readership in the headlines. At one point, World correspondent as James Creelman wrote in his log, he sent a message from Cuba to Hearst saying “There will be no war.” Hearst replied, “Please remain. You furnish the pictures and I’ll furnish the war.”

Later, the U.S. sent a dreadnought, the U.S.S. Maine to Havana to guard American interests as hostilities broke out there. It sank, likely the result of an internal boiler explosion, but Hearst’s headline was “MAINE EXPLOSION CAUSED BY BOMB OR TORPEDO”. Pullitzer’s Journal screamed, “DESTRUCTION OF THE WAR SHIP MAINE WAS THE WORK OF AN ENEMY” above an illustration of a terrible explosion splitting the ship in two pieces. The headlines helped to begin the Spanish-American War.

Three years later, Ambrose Bierce claimed that Hearst’s reporting led Leon Czolgosz to shoot President McKinley. These claims devastated Hearst’s hopes to become president himself, but he denied it to be the case.

Later, in 1941, Frank Luther Mott gave a description of signs of “Yellow Journalism”:

1. scare headlines in huge print, often of minor news
2. lavish use of pictures, or imaginary drawings
3. use of faked interviews, misleading headlines, pseudo-science, and a parade of false learning from so-called experts
4. emphasis on full-color Sunday supplements, usually with comic strips
5. dramatic sympathy with the “underdog” against the system.

How many are still in use today?

Wikipedia: Yellow Journalism

Republican Congressman Peter King (Manuel Balce Ceneta, AP)

Cracks in the Façade

Since President George W. Bush (not Congress!) declared America’s Global War on Terror during the tragic fall of 2001, its armed forces have been engaged in conflicts around the world. American engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan have received the lion’s share of the press coverage, owing as much to the intensity of the action as well as to the falsity of the claims that led to the Iraqi action, though the U.S. is still active in both countries, along with Yemen and now Pakistan. Support for all of these wars has been spurred by the meme: The threat of violent Islam.

Louie Gohmert (R-TX) even decried terror babies that were being born and bred to infiltrate the United States. That is right, terrorists are born that way even if gays are not! Regardless of the “financial advantage that terrorists gain” Gohmert claims by living in the United States, do we not have confidence that terrorists might come to peace with their new standard of living?

Louie Gohmert and Anderson Cooper on 'terror babies'

We are told that everything that one need concern themselves about the wars are encapsulated in that phrase. The threat of violent Islam. It tells us Islam is violent by nature. We are threatened by it. In our fear, we react (ironically, violently) in order to protect ourselves – because they do not know peace. Presidents Bush and Obama both promised to attack this extremism wherever it can be found, lest the threat ever reach our shores.

But worldwide conflicts require military equipment and the fighting have been incredibly lucrative for American defense contractors. The profit-driven media conglomerates that derive their revenue by selling ad spots for these defense companies have found a honey pot in hard times. Hence there should be no surprise that the main stream media have been complicit in beginning wars under false pretenses as well as promoting the meme: The threat of violent Islam. “They hate us because of who we are!” “They want to destroy America!” They must be stopped!

The attacks on reason and the coercions are broadly based. All while we hear the slogans and calls for action on TV, salon monkeys such as David Brooks – a politically active commentator for the New York Times – goes on the writers circuit touting his book while encouraging people to make spontaneous and emotionally charged decisions, as if he were working in a vacuum.

Yet the spreading peaceful demonstrations against dictatorships that had been supported by the American military industrial complex (remember Made in the U.S.A. in Tahrir Square?) has placed a crimp in both the popularity in supporting puppet dictators as well as a realization that there is another route to peace: Peace itself. Peace, solidarity and human rights are now the considerations of Americans when they look to the Middle East as the labor and democracy movements there inspire the growing labor and democracy movement at home. Many Americans no longer see Islam as violent by nature, but they do see Muslims, Christians and Secular Arabs working together in order to ensure a better life for themselves. They are beginning to realize that democratically-elected leaders who prop up dictators have no respect for the democracy that they protect.

The defense industry and the media have an advertising problem because people are now becoming aware of the misinformation that they have spread for the sake of corporate profits and lowering wages at home. Most of all, when Americans look to the Middle East, they are increasingly seeing themselves.

As a result, people who see an alternative have been flocking away from the mainstream media and toward NPR and PBS, whose coverage of international affairs has been very good in stark contrast to the corporate media. Listeners to NPR routinely rank higher than Fox, CNN and Network news in terms of their knowledge about current events. And the situation is even more stark in radio: Right wing radio is being eviscerated at a time when NPR ratings are on the rise. People can now tell the difference between information and propaganda.

That NPR, a non-profit organization, is now directly competing with profit-driven organizations like Fox and CNN makes NPR very dangerous indeed. It means that the profit-driven news model, already teetering on collapse, faces new pressures from an organization that does not need to pay dividends to stockholders. For the political class, the quality of NPR’s reporting it means that listeners are increasingly hearing dissenting points of view and that makes them less likely to listen to the propaganda – including the propaganda that capitalism is the best economic model always. (Just ignore that NPR is a non-profit. Look over here! A muslim radical! And he is a SOCIALIST!) People will be less likely to support wars in distant places, now understanding the true costs involved. That will affect profit margins in defense, the news and politics alike.

In the world of American politics as infected with aggressive mendacity as it is, whither the news organization at the head of the class?

Coordinated attack?

Last Thursday was yet another highly ironic day in Washington D.C. Two days after the major media widely promoted the sting operation on NPR by James O’Keefe that supposedly led to NPR CEO Vivian Schiller and executive Ron Schiller (no relation) to step down. NPR denies it, though many corporate news organizations argued it was because of their biased views of the Tea Party being a racist and xenophobic organization, Tea Party Republican Congressman Peter King opened his hearings on Muslim Extremism in the United States.

The recent activity revolving around Islam seems to be a coordinated distract, divide and confuse operation by the right. It would be a way to divide the NPR audience, to place the attention of the news cycle on militant Islam once again, to distract from the pro-democracy movements and to cause people to think emotionally again – going against the grain of NPR programming.

The plan to hold hearings on Muslim extremists had been known long in advance. Here is a link to a Talking Points Memo article regarding the hearings, dated 17 December, 2011. There would have been plenty of time for James O’Keefe to coordinate the February 22nd meeting with Ron Schiller of NPR, and there would have been time to release the hidden video tape prior to the hearings on March 9th – just in time to distract attention from Peter King’s hearings, which in addition to a more complete conversation regarding violent extremism in the U.S. as a whole, had already received well-balanced treatment by NPR in January.

The January NPR piece discussed violent extremism in its widest sense, primarily in the wake of Gabriel Giffords shooting earlier that month. In addition to discussing radical Islam, its conversation included comments about right-wing extremists such as Timothy McVeigh and other individuals such as Ted Kaczynski and Jared Loughner. The piece brought in voices as various as the heads of the Tea Party Express and the Southern Poverty Law Center, but this was not the type of attention that Peter King was seeking for his high-profile hearings.

The Players

Last year, Andrew Breitbart attacked the US Department of Agriculture for its handling of legal settlements for African American farmers who have faced discrimination from the USDA. Breitbart alleged fraud and discrimination against whites in claims that continued from an earlier scandal during the case of Shirley Sherrod during the spring of 2010. Sherrod has since sued Breitbart for defamation of the case, and she is certain to win it due to the fact that Andrew Breitbart publicized a snippet of her comments in the exact opposite context in which they were intended. (Here is the Breitbart video. And here is the whole thing.) The entire issue had been reported heavily by NPR.

Andrew Breitbart is the same person who brought James O’Keefe to fame in the now infamous case where O’Keefe dressed as a (rather unconvincing) pimp and spliced video together to falsely claim that the community action group Acorn was supporting prostitution for public funds. Acorn won a lawsuit over defamation, but still lost public funding due to the wild political connotations that were now associated with its reputation. Breitbart was instrumental in having the segment aired on Fox and Friends.

Since that time, O’Keefe’s other “journalistic” adventures include trying to lure CNN’s Abbie Boudreau into a “den of sin”. He had planned to essentially sexually harass her while she was supposed to interview him in an effort to discredit CNN, but she found out and exposed the plot.

In another incident, O’Keefe was arrested for infiltrating Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu’s office in New Orleans to wiretap her office – a felony. O’Keefe mentioned that he was trying to expose Landrieu’s support for the health care reform bill. O’Keefe plead guilty but was only sentenced to 75 hours of community service and $1,500 in fines.

As early as October, 2010, Representative King had called to defund NPR. On the 22nd of that month, Politico quoted him after NPR’s firing of Juan Williams over his racist statement regarding how he felt nervous when Muslims boarded his flights:

“NPR has disgraced itself by caving into CAIR [Council on American-Islamic Relations] and by firing Juan Williams for exercising his right of free speech. This is political correctness carried to its extreme form. Congress should move to defund NPR because of its indefensible bias.”

This led to a row between Fox News and NPR regarding the supposedly “politically-motivated” firing of a conservative journalist. Actually, Juan Williams was fired for his bigoted comments on the O’Reilly Factor. With Fox losing viewership to NPR, there could be a concern that Fox was merely working with leftovers from NPR. So what does one do? What Fox was designed to do: Make relentlessly repeated petty political attacks until people begin to memorize the slogans. In fact, Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. is giving millions of dollars to Fox News to support its war on NPR. And most ironically of all, Fox News is complaining about bias!

It has not worked – NPR is still growing – and Peter King is a very frequent guest on Fox News – especially in segments regarding race. Peter King also receives a good deal of political contributions from defense contractors, communications companies and lobbying groups – Koch Industries, too, like any good Tea Partier.

King rather infamously took part in a television show just prior to the hearings. The show was produced for a group called Act! for America, a conservative group that is against the spread of radical Islam. The tactics of this group, however, leave much to be desired. In her book, Because They Hate: A Survivor of Islamic Terror Warns America, founder Brigitte Gabriel claims that she says “what many in America are thinking but afraid to say out loud, for fear of being labeled a racist, bigot, Islamophobic, or intolerant.” Yet Representative King decided to participate in a rather one-sided show for the group anyway. See for yourself:

The ACT for America Show (Act! for America, via Youtube)

Remember, those were Muslim rockets! This group clearly has an axe to grind, yet Peter King resisted complaints that suggested that he was enacting the hearings for political gamesmanship and he refused to discuss the notion of violent extremism on the whole.

Act! for America has cooperated with the Chino Tea Party (the branch of the Tea Party based in Chino, CA) to support demonstrations against Muslims and Muslim groups. A screenshot of an announcement for a February Act! America/Tea Party demonstration against a fundraising event for the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) is shown here:

Chino Tea Party/Act! America Announcement of anti-muslim protest (Chino Tea Party)

Given the tone of the rhetoric in such an announcement, one may be curious about the nature of that protest. Here is video of the protest:

Chino Tea Party/Act! America anti-muslim protest, Yorba Linda, CA, 2/13/2011 (George M. Collins, via RealityDictates on YouTube)

The cheers after the death threats in the above video are typically reserved in mainstream media for “Islamic militants”, though you clearly heard that from caucasian citizens of Orange County, CA. The demonstrated ignorance with the assumption of a difference between “God” and “Allah” was an added bonus around 4:17. Why would Peter King associate himself with this group just prior to holding hearings in which to inform himself on the issue of violent extremism?

The Hearings

There is also irony that Peter King would hold a hearing on violent extremism to say the least. As it happens, Representative King has a long history of support for another violent and extreme group, the Irish Republican Army. At one point in 1985, he told a pro-I.R.A. rally:

“If civilians are killed in an attack on a military installation, it is certainly regrettable, but I will not morally blame the I.R.A. for it.”

Representative King’s hearings did not include the vast majority of the thousand or so violent or hate-driven groups that are organized around the country. Still, they led to an interesting view both into the mindset of the Congressman and his influence on people around him. Here are King’s opening statements:

Rep. King opening comments to Homeland Security Committee Hearing on radical Islam (House Committee on Homeland Security, via YouTube)

Not only is radical Islam a problem, but so too are the forces of political correctness! But Neo-nazis are apparently not a problem for Rep. King.

“There is no equivalency of threat between al Qaeda and Neo-Nazis, environmental extremists, or other isolated mad men. Only al-Qaeda and Islamist affiliates in this country are a part of an international threat to our nation.”

With a start like that, how did the hearings go? As Talking Points Memo states it: Peter King Hearing Focuses On Whether Peter King Hearing Was A Good Idea. Rep. Charlie Dingell (D-MI) cautioned against the McCarthyite atmosphere around the hearings. But some of the most emphatic testimony from the hearings was from Representative Keith Ellison (D-MN), the lone Muslim in Congress, shown here.

Rep. Ellison comments to Homeland Security Committee Hearing on radical Islam (House C-Span 3, via YouTube)

One interesting comment by Ellison: The best protection against violent extremism is social and economic inclusion. That is not the type of statement that supports the militarization of the planet.

But what of the threat of violent Islam? It is certainly true there are violent Islamic extremists. One, supported by the U.S. since the end of the Bush Administration, is currently attacking his own citizens in Libya. They had the temerity to stand up and demand democracy. Another extremist is a dictator in Yemen, who is currently supported by the U.S. military as it enacts drone strikes on Al Qaeda cells in that country – acts that have led to the uprising for democracy that are taking place there. Osama bin Laden is still at large, likely in the mountains of western Pakistan, and he himself was supported by the U.S. while he and the Taliban were part of the Mujahadeen during the war between the Soviet Union and Afghanistan. Everywhere that one finds violent Islamic organizations, one finds dealings the U.S. military and the dictator de jour who is supported to keep the oil spigots running. Perhaps we should listen to Keith Ellison. Unfortunately, each of the major cable news networks, Fox New, MSNBC and CNN, showed Rep. King’s statements, but they cut away before the Democrats Bennie Thompson and Keith Ellison spoke! There is a reason why the Keith Ellison clip above was from C-Span 3.

Schiller’s comments

Let us consider who is right in the argument regarding NPR. Here is what Schiller said:

Ron Schiller discusses the Tea Party with a fake muslim group (AP, via Youtube)

While it might be disconcerting to hear a news executive give his own personal opinions on politics, what part of what he said was wrong? It would be incorrect to claim that all Tea Partiers are racist and that all of them are fundamentalist Christians, but Schiller does not specifically make that claim. It is certainly true that the Tea Party is connected to racist groups. That case has been made in this article, and in addition, a white supremacist played an important role in writing the Arizona immigration law last year. Which group is currently supporting elimination of restrictions on firearms? Which one is enacting anti-immigration laws all over the country? It is the Tea Party in each case. NPR should not have repudiated Schiller’s statements.

As for the liberal bias of NPR, here is a piece that it aired regarding the entire James O’Keefe affair. Listen to it and ask the question, “Would Fox News ever be so complete and self-critical in any of the stories it airs?”

NPR also refused the false $5 million donation prior to the release of the O’Keefe video.

Postscript

Despite all of the posturing over radical Muslims, the fact remains that the dominant form of extremism in the United States is right-wing extremism. One case of right-wing extremism came to light Friday when Francis “Schaeffer” Cox and four accomplices, all “sovereign citizens” who believe they are subject to no governmental authority, were arrested for plotting to kill a federal judge and a number of Alaska State Troopers.

UPDATE

The Atlantic is now reporting that NPR has released a couple of internal emails. They show that NPR was not duped by the fake muslim organization and they also demonstrate strict adherence to the law when it regards donations. In short, James O’Keefe’s dishonesty managed to show just how great a public organization NPR truly is. On the other hand, aren’t there laws against entrapment?

Wisconsin Protests

Protests in Madison continued through the weekend. 30-50,000 people showed up Saturday to protest against Governor Walker’s attacks on working families. Mail carriers had their day on Sunday. But the Tea Party had a pro-Walker rally on Sunday as well at Alliant Energy Center. Despite having access to the Kochs’ billions, they could only muster 600 people to support Scott Walker. A new poll came out, albeit with a very small sample (603 respondents, corresponding to errors greater than +/- 4%), showing very negative reactions to Governor Walker, a strong majority against stripping unions of collective bargaining rights, and 72% of Wisconsinites want to solve the Walker-created budgetary problems by raising taxes on people earning more than $150,000 per year. HUGE protests are expected across the nation next Saturday, with more events also planned throughout the week. And the bottom may be dropping out on Governor Walker as thousands of dairy farmers plan to drive their tractors to the Capitol to show support for unions next Saturday. In Wisconsin, when dairy farmers protest Republicans, it generally means the end of the careers of those Republicans. Some are predicting that the protests in Madison are just the beginning, as the debate to cut Social Security begins in Washington.

Other Tea Party Fun

In Ohio, the Tea Party legislature is passing tougher anti-union legislation than the bill in Madison. It makes it a criminal offense for workers to go on strike. Some shenanigans were required in order to get the bill through committee, however. When a committee was deadlocked on the proposal with even some Republicans dissenting, the Republican Senate Majority Leader fired two Republican Senators from their committee assignments so that the bill could reach the floor. Still, even some Republicans are calling the bill unconstitutional and it likely violates existing labor laws. Unfortunately Ohio Dems can not prevent a quorum in the Republican-filled Ohio legislature. This week has seen the largest protests to date in Columbus.

Indiana Democratic House Members are still in Illinois, preventing a vote on anti-union legislation there. As protests in Indiana continue, Indiana’s newly elected Republican Secretary of State Charlie White is probably going to jail. He has ben indicted on three counts of felony voter fraud for registering to vote in places where he did not live. One would think that a State Secretary of State, who is in charge of elections within the state, would understand the rules here – that is unless that was the reason for his choice to run. Keep in mind that White has supported the voter ID requirement in Indiana, ostensibly to prevent people from voting illegally as he has done. There are a lot more interesting details in this article
from the Brad Blog.

The State Legislature of Arizona has passed an unconstitutional bill to nullify federal laws. Laws of this sort were the same type that precipitated the Civil War, when southern states attempted to nullify federal regulation of slavery. This comes on the heels of a vote by the Arizona Legislature to allow people to carry guns to public events, because, you know, guns at public events are a fantastic idea and it is not as if one of their own members of Congress was shot in the head by a lunatic carrying a gun or anything just two months ago. Oh, as it happens, Jared Loughner has just been hit with 49 additional criminal counts for his firing spree on a crowd at a Giffords event in January.

The Tea Party-led Montana State Legislature is still at it. Even Republicans are now claiming that the Tea Party is leading to the the Republicans to become such a national laughingstock that they are driving away young GOP voters. In addition to working to allow guns in schools, they are trying to, as MT Cowgirl puts it, “legislate the laws of nature” to deny climate change, eliminate stem cell research, to claim the earth is between 4,000 and 6,000 years old, and to criminalize homosexuality.

Florida Tea Party Governor Rick Scott may be subject to a criminal investigation over his firing of the state nursing home long-term care obmudsman. It is not generally considered a smart move to anger the nursing homes in the state with the nation’s most geriatric population.

Wikileaks

Julian Assange is appealing the expected British court ruling that he should be extradited to Sweden. His organization WikiLeaks has already uncovered a huge amount of corruption from countries accross the world. It was revelations of the excesses of the family of the Tunisian dictator that have led to pro-democracy rallies across Africa and Asia. Meanwhile, Bradley Manning, who the military claims gave WikiLeaks documents that it later published, is in detention under cruel and unusual conditions – including being kept in his cell naked, being refused sleep, etc. Does this sound familiar?

Corruption on the Supreme Court

Calls are coming out for the removal of Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Antonin Scalia for illegally participating in political fundraising, tax evasion and refusing to make public conflicts of interest.

Jon Stewart Defends Teachers (The Daily Show)

Wisconsin State Capitol (rbw)

After a Dane County Court ruled that the State was violating a prior ruling to allow protesters into the State Capitol, the scene at the Capitol was quiet once protesters left peacefully in accordance with the part of the ruling that prohibits nighttime sleepovers in the building. However, the cynical action by the Governor was not finished. Members of the Walker Administration claimed that it may take as much as $7 million to repair the damage done during the 2-week sleepover in the building. Though when pressed by the media, the Walker Administration was forced to backtrack, indicating that there was no damage to the building and all that was necessary was a through cleaning, including removing signs taped to the marble interior.

That was not all. The police presence at the State Capitol remains strong, though many officers are working during the day, only to join the protests after their shifts are complete. Democratic Assemblyman Nick Milroy of South Range was tackled to the ground when he tried to enter his office to get his coat. Video of the incident can be seen on WISN.

Because of the lockdown earlier this week, Democratic Legislators moved their desks outside so that they could meet with their constituents. Republicans did not apparently want to meet their constituents, in contrast, because they kept their desks inside during the lockdown. The Dems have kept their desks outside, even after visitors could enter the Capitol again.

After .22 caliber bullets were found in several locations around the State Capitol Thursday, visitors to the Capitol were screened heavily for weapons. Because of the incredibly peaceful nature of the protests so far and because Governor Walker has already admitted to considering to bring thugs in to create trouble, the discovery of the bullets has prompted Wisconsin ex-Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager to say:

“For all we know somebody planted them there — we don’t know if it was a protester.”

Thanks to the 14 Democratic Senators who are still in Illinois on their own dime, under the threat of an unconstitutional arrest, more details of the Koch-supported Budget “Repair” bill are coming to light. The ramifications are profound, including a $1billion cut to education across the state, the budget could end interlibrary book loans, it would force local referendums in order to maintain services, and strip collective bargaining rights for union employees, as well as end their subsidized child care. In a nod to the insurance companies that backed his campaign financially, the bill would also gut the self-supporting Wisconsin State Insurance Fund. This is a crystal clear example of companies giving candidates contributions for political services.

It would not be the only corruption on the part of Scott Walker. The Milwaukee Magazine has outlined cronyism and corruption that occurred in the Milwaukee County pension system under Walker’s watch. He has violated a Dane County judge by refusing entry for demonstrators into the Capitol. He has apparently lied to the press, who are now suing, over the notion that he had received a large number of emails in favor of his budget proposal. He likely broke the law when he mentioned that he had considered sending thugs to create trouble to discredit the protests and he is clearly in the pocket of the Koch brothers, given his friendly relationship with them, and he has been threatening state workers with pink slips if he does not get his way, a form of political coercion. In addition to all of that, Walker likely broke state labor laws by refusing to negotiate with the unions. Laura Flanders discussed these legal issues with Lautenschlager.

With his legal exposure, the story gets worse for Walker. Recall efforts are underway for 8 Republican Senators and they are going swimmingly. The recall of three senators gives the Democrats a majority and the recall of all 8 gives them a 2/3 majority, which they could use to bring about impeachment hearings. Scott Walker’s window to pass his budget is closing and he knows it: Some Republicans may even break with the party if it comes up for a vote.

So do the mainstream media William Rivers Pitt discusses why the mainstream media has not been reporting the huge crowds in Madison, preferring to discuss Charlie Sheen instead. In short, he says “I think they’re scared.” More on media coverage later!

Protesters in Madison (via Rossomando Report)

There is plenty of good news coming from Wisconsin. Wisconsin workers have filed recall petitions against the eight Republican State Senators who can be recalled immediately. The AFL-CIO piece quotes a Steelworker:

Gov. Walker and Senate Republicans are refusing to listen to the hundreds of thousands of working families who traveled to Madison to make their voices heard. He has refused to listen to the majority of the people of this state who disagree with them. So now it is time for us to make our voices heard in their districts. If they will not listen to “we the people” then the “we the people” are going to take our government back.

The independent media is shining in its coverage of the corporate takeover of Wisconsin. New information continues to be released indicating that corporations do not pay their fair share of taxes, of the criminal enterprises of the Koch brothers, and the Kochs are losing the battle of public opinion. Several recent polls indicate that Americans are roughly 60-30% against stripping unions of collective bargaining rights and Walker’s approval rating is in the 30s and sinking.

In other news, Democrat Tom Barrett would win in a recall election against Governor Walker – an even that is almost guaranteed considering that Rachel Maddow is now reporting that half of Wisconsin wants the Governor to be recalled. The Wisconsin Democratic Party is now funding the campaign to recall these officials. Wisconsin will have a different legislature and it will eventually have a new governor and the longer that the protests and the Democratic Senators hold out, the more likely Scott Walker can be found liable for a crime. Even the Republican Party is turning on Walker. According to The Progressive:

Since 1871, there has been a civil rights statute on the books entitled “Conspiracy Against Rights” (See TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 241.)

It reads as follows:

“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same . . . They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.”

So put pressure on Scott Walker. Write to the Attorney General and demand that he investigate the “phone call” and Walker’s connections to the Koch brothers. And when A.G. Van Hollen refuses, demand that he step down as well. When the Kochs, the Governor and his cronies are forced to defend themselves, the workers go on offense and then they can repair the damage that has been done to the state.

There is a lot of great news! Keep up the awesome work! Write your newspapers and TV stations, contact everyone you can. If we keep it up, we will win!

A full slate of protests are continuing as well. Check the SEIU and the Wisconsin AFL-CIO websites for detais, but here is a breakdown of locations for activities:

Thursday, 3 March, 2011
Burlington
Kenosha
Janesville
Jefferson
Juneau
Rhinelander
Superior
Whitewater

Friday, 4 March, 2011
Lake Delton
Milwaukee
Montello
Portage
Spooner
Wausau

Saturday, 5 March, 2011
Burlington
Columbus
Solon Springs

…and of course MADISON! More big protests likely on Saturday!

100,000 people showed up to rally against the GOP in Madison Saturday (John Hart, State Journal, via Madison Capitol Times)

After a weekend of protests that spread through all 50 states, the numbers continue to rise as rallies continue. The protests in Ohio are growing quite large as well. More that 20,000 people rallied in Columbus on Monday, protesting more Koch-supported union-busting Tea Party legislation passing through the legislature there.

One hiccup did occur as Governor Walker refused to allow protesters into the State Capitol Monday, though he was hit with a restraining order by a Dane Country judget. In addition, police refused to enforce the Governor’s order to clear the building, arguing that they “are not the Palace Guard”. It is public relations like these that explain why more than one million Wisconsinites are willing to sign a petition for Scott Walker’s recall. That is about 1 in 4 voters in the state asking for his recall, and that is only after one week.

Walker’s political future may be doomed, but he plans to continue to do damage before he leaves. The Governor, who was ousted from Marquette University for cheating while still only garnering a 2.4 GPA, is gutting the Wisconsin state educational system with cuts of up to $900 million in aid to schools. Meanwhile, the damage continues to build. Restaurants are leaving the Wisconsin Restaurant Association for its support of the Walker Budget “Repair” Bill.

As the national assault on education continues, including the Detroit school districts packing up to 60 pupils per classroom and all of the Providence teachers being fired in one swoop, more and more evidence of criminality and conspiracy begin to arise.

The Media are doing their part to aid Governor Walker’s disinformation program. Fox “News” has once again been caught lying,
when it turns out that a reporter who claimed to be punched by a protester – well, was not punched by a protester. They have been shouted down by protesters to the tune of “Fox News Lies” (because it does), but there has been no violence directed toward them. Fox’s response to “Fox News Lies” has been to argue that the protesters have a lot of “vitriol toward the media” and that the protesters want to shut down communication. Watch the link to see the worst, most dishonest reporting ever. Good Grief.

But Fox News is not the only complicit new organization helping the Tea Party out. The New York Times has once again taken to burying the lead. Oh, sure the real news is right there – on page 23 – but you have to get past the misleading headlines first. Keith Olbermann, now of Fok News, has exposed a piece in which a “regular union guy” from Janesville, WI argued against the teachers’ right to collectively bargain. Well, it turns out that the New York Times failed to report that the “regular union guy” was not actually a member of a union, the plant he supposedly worked for has been closed for years, and they misspelled his name. Oops.

Word is slowly getting out that Minnesota, with a bigger biennial budget deficit than Wisconsin, is closing its gap by taxing the rich. Wisconsin should do the same, since the wealthy and corporations in Wisconsin actually pay lower taxes than their fair share. And if those other companies are like Koch Industries, they have gotten rich by demanding bailouts and robbing from the states anyway.

The cyber-activist group, Anonymous, is also getting involved. They have taken down the Americans for Prosperity website as their first attack on a Koch-run organization. They say:

“[i]t has come to our attention that the brother, David and Charles Koch- the billionaire owners of Koch Industries-have long attempted to usurp American Democracy. Their actions to undermine the legitimate political process in Wisconsin are the final straw. Starting today we fight back.”

Only one of these insecure blowhards finished college. Guess who - the answer is in the article! (News/WireImage/AP, via NY Daily News)

Oh Fox News, how you do love to play into the fears and insecurities of your viewers. No network has done so much to blunt the minds of a nation as Roger Ailes’ operation that has been screaming for weeks about the idea that teachers and nurses might wish to be compensated fairly for the long hours they put in and the hard work that they do. It is a natural enmity, though. Teachers do, after all, try to inform the public, so Fox News would obviously see them as a threat to its own programming. It is such a violent threat that the mere mention of labor protests in the Middle East and Madison have cause Glenn Beck to warn us this is the sign of the coming Apocalypse! Seriously.

It is not difficult to find misinformation on Fox News. The general search technique involves checking to see whether lips are moving on the TV while the dial is set to Rupert Murdoch’s enterprise. Nor must one wait long for invective. Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity (all of whom but Bill O’Reilly flunked out of college) have all been decrying those “fat cat” teachers with their plump pension funds and their long hours for low pay. But most of all, they have been attacking the Wisconsin state employees unions.

BUT:

All four, Beck, O’Reilly, Limbaugh and Hannity, are members of the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA), a union that is affiliated with the AFL-CIO.

So these blowhards have been frothing about unions and workers rights while enjoying all of the benefits of union membership themselves. It is amazing that anyone would be so willing to listen to these hypocrites.

Nearly 100,000 people rallied in Madison Saturday (AP via Huffington Post)

The Events

A HUGE rally took place on Saturday in Madison, Wisconsin as unions continue to fight against the elimination of their collective bargaining rights. It was the largest demonstration since Governor Walker initiated his proposal, with up to 100,000 protesters and no end in sight. Other protests continued across all 50 states as well Saturday in solidarity with the state employees in Wisconsin.

The Distraction

Despite the huge numbers of people involved in every state, the corporate media has seen fit to bury the lead by focusing on labor protests in other countries, Libya in particular, without mentioning that they are in fact being driven by labor. When was the last time that you have heard about demonstrations continuing in Egypt? They are still going on. Once the military junta took over, the American press essentially said, “Oh, look! They have democracy now and everything will be ok!” (Glenn Beck excepted, of course.) They ignore that now that the protesters have gotten some reforms and are working on a route to democracy, they are still in Tahrir Square arguing for better working conditions and wages and that is apparently making the Egyptian army a bit impatient.

But all eyes were on far off Libya Sunday, where it is easier now to declare the initially peaceful demonstrators as “opposition forces” because they have been forced to arm themselves to prevent their own extermination. After arming themselves, they have been pigeonholed into a different commonly used media meme: The old labor and democracy demonstrations are now an ‘uprising’.

Koch Strategy

Burying the lead is a tried and true anti-democratic tactic that is used by entrenched media in order to help diffuse trouble for authorities. Despite that 50,000 people protested across the country and that 100,000 people protested within Madison itself and countless thousands of others across Wisconsin this weekend, CNN, the New York Times, CBS, ABC and NBC are under-reporting the events. Fox News is mischaracterizing teachers and nurses as violent and greedy fat cats.

In order to understand why, just consider when was the last time that you saw either a Dixie Cup or a Georgia Pacific commercial on one of their stations. Sure, they will post Union ads, but when the crisis is over, they expect to continue getting ad revenue from Koch Industries. The Koch brothers have vowed to continue their fight, and the media is only one of their tactics in order to end the disagreement over their proposals for workers’ bargaining rights, health insurance and benefits.

The Koch brothers do have things roughly where they expected to be at the moment. The Governor submitted his ghost-written proposal, the Assembly has passed its version of the bill, sticking it to the guys who disagreed with it with the quick vote, but there is that nagging problem of those pesky Democratic Senators. You had better believe that the Koch brothers will buy a lot of ad time to pressure them into returning and Walker will ask the legislature to pass one piece of regressive legislation after another until they do. (However, Walker would do that even if the Dems were present in the Senate.)

The protests are a LOT larger than they expected, too.

The Tea Party, after all, was constructed just for this reason: A trojan horse, riding a wave of popular anger only to turn on the people who elected it in order to support the corporate interests of Koch Industries. The Kochs founded the Tea Party through its PACs and they have already used it to divide and conquer the public. Now, the public must try to divide and conquer the Koch minions like Walker and the Legislature. And the Koch brothers will do *anything* to get their way, so the strategy of the people must be broad-based as well.

How the public can win against the billionaires

Even though the media is beginning to side with the Kochs, their ad revenue would drop remarkably if their viewer/readership were to decrease. People who support the protesters can not expect to have their voices heard on the airwaves, but they should demand that it is. A lot of news today can be found on the internet and there are certainly a good number of places that ARE reporting the labor protests. The places that are supporting the labor movement include, but are not limited to:

The Madison Capitol Times
The Appleton Post Crescent
Harpers
Mother Jones
MSNBC (Rachel Maddow is awesome!)
The Real News Network
The Daily Kos
The Huffington Post
Truth Out
Buzzflash
…and others that I have not listed here, though you can find the links in my blogs. The Daily Show and the Colbert Report have really good fact-checking as well. All of the above news sources should be supported because without them, it would be much harder to get the word out.

The mainstream, mass-market media are not quite so helpful. This includes:
ABC News
CBS News
CNN
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (has published quite a few negative editorials)
The New York Times
The Washington Post
…and most of all:
Fox News who have portrayed the protesters as violent.

I have also heard anecdotally that a number of TV stations and local papers have been characterizing the demonstrations negatively. Remember, local news sources need to compete for thin resources and ad-buys are very important. This means that they can be swayed by big money, and the Kochs have plenty of it.

BUT…

All of that ad money will useless if people no longer watch their channels or read their papers. The people can have a lot of influence over programming when they organize. You will be surprised!

People who are marching are doing their part of the job. They are putting pressure on the Government and they are making their voices heard. To help them out, everyone who supports the protesters should do whatever they can to assist. Here are a few things that will take just a few minutes a day:

1. Call on the State Attorney General, J.B. Van Hollen, (608) 266-1221, to begin investigations into ethics violations by Governor Walker regarding the phone call, his tendency to give friends fat pay raises and his handling of the proposal. Call for investigations into the Republicans in the Legislature as well. Are they working with the Kochs too?

The Attorney General is a Republican as well, and the Governor has asked him to find ways to get the Democratic Senators to return. You should not expect the State Attorney General to do something right away, but if people call him, write letters to local newspapers and sign petitions calling for investigations, AND KEEP UP THE PRESSURE, then we may see either Hollen or Walker crack under that pressure and make more mistakes. Then they may accidentally reveal more corruption and links to the Kochs like the phone call did. If more information about either person is exposed, then they may be forced to part ties to defend themselves and then they may turn on each other. That is the goal: The Kochs know that pressure helps people make mistakes. Let’s use it on them.

2. Call for Federal Elections Commission investigations into the political operations of the Koch brothers. Are they donating money to their political organizations legally? We should know. Let us force the Koch brothers to spend their money to defend themselves legally. That means they will funnel less money to their own groups to mess with public elections.

3. Call or write your local Television Stations to ask for fair reporting of the protests. This is VERY important, as important as the protests themselves! Be sure to mention that you will migrate to other news sources if they do not begin treating teachers and care givers favorably. This link to Wikipedia has a list of all of Wisconsin’s TV Stations. Click on the station call sign and you will go to a Wikipedia page on that station that will have an address to the actual station website. You can find all appropriate contact information there.

4. If the media is not reporting, then you have to spread the word. Be fair, be accurate, and if you are not sure on details, describe what you know and what you do not. No one has all of the information, but we all try to do our best and we ask questions when we are uncertain about something. Spread the word via texting, Facebook, Twitter, email, telephone, smoke signals or even two paper cups on a string (not Dixie cups!). Form groups, networks and call lists have dinners, lunches and get togethers and let people know when you find something out.

5. Boycott companies and news sources that support the Tea Party, Scott Walker and the Budget “Repair” bill. I have already posted a partial list of companies with links (it is my most popular article so far) and I also have a post on Koch Industries and their related products for more information. The Kochs love the idea of free markets with no regulations. Let us use a market-based approach to show them what happens when they try to take away rights in ‘free markets’! They count on us to buy their products, so if they support taking away benefits and wage-bargaining rights, let us have an impact on their pocketbooks too.

6. Remember who supports the Budget ‘Repair’ Bill for the next elections! AND NEVER, EVER VOTE TEA PARTY AGAIN! That will be soon. Put this on your calendar: There is a State Supreme Court Election April 5th. Prosser is a part of the Court’s conservative majority. Vote Kloppenburg to reduce the power of the Tea Party in the court. VOTE!

7. RECALL Current Legislators and (eventually Governor Walker). The Daily Kos has provided links and information regarding the Republican Senators who can be recalled this year.

8. Discuss this with everyone – even your conservative relatives. This is a civil rights issue and billionaires are trying to take rights away from workers.

9. Wash, rinse, and repeat. This is a waiting game. It will take a while because billionaires have deep pockets. We essentially need to make it very expensive for them to meddle in the political system so that they stop doing it. You have two choices: Stick it out for the long haul and win OR the Kochs get their way and everyone will eventually have an impact to their livelihoods (especially the Tea Partiers themselves).

Remember, the more organized the public is, the easier it will be to get rid of Walker, the Kochs and their cronies. Everyone who supports the state employees should help because once the Kochs take care of them, they will come after the next group. They are all about power and they are working hard to take it all for themselves, so you have to work hard as well to keep your rights.

There are more of us than them. Public opinion strongly favors the workers. Tell other people you know about how they can help. We can do this and we are all in it together.

Space Shuttle Discovery lifts off for the last time (Michael Berigan/Reuters)

Space

The Space Shuttle Discovery launched into orbit for the last time Thursday, carrying a new crew to the International Space Station. There will be two more flights before the end of the Space Shuttle program. The shuttle Endeavour is scheduled to make one more trip to space in April, followed by the last shuttle flight by Atlantis in June. The shuttle program was to be superseded by the Constellation program, a series of manned and unmanned missions that were aimed toward bringing the United States back to low earth orbit, then the Moon and ultimately Mars. Citing current private companies such as SpaceX that are developing manned orbital systems, president Obama cancelled the Constellation program. At the moment, it appears United States will not be the first country to Mars.

Developments in Libya

Mu’ammar Gadhafi blamed al Qaeda today for the uprising spreading through his country, saying that Osama bin Laden had brainwashed young Libyans who had been given hypnotic drugs in their milk. Opposition groups now control most of Libya, but Gadhafi’s stronghold is in the capital, Tripoli, where his forces are exacting a heavy toll, though some troops and pilots are refusing to fire on protesters. The death toll due to the government attacks on civilians is likely higher than 1,000. Opposition groups continue to make gains despite the government’s counterattack and they are massing in the opposition-controlled eastern portion of the country. The United States, after a generation of enmity and containment, has found that it has few options regarding the situation in Libya. It has few contacts with the leadership, no aircraft carriers in the Mediterranean, and is forced to rely on nations such as France and Italy that have had friendlier relations with Libya. Even worse, once the opposition forces take over there may not be such a warm and rosy relationship with the new government because President Bush sold Gadhafi weapons. Yes, once again weapons emblazoned with “Made in U.S.A.” are firing at civilians who are trying to form a new democracy. So much for shoot first and ask questions later.

WikiLeaks

Julian Assange has lost his trial for extradition to Sweden. This was expected as most extraditions within the EU are granted. Assange has promised to appeal the ruling and has seven days to do so or else he will be extradited within 10 days.

David Koch (New Yorker)

In the aftermath of Wisconsin Governor’s phone call with a David Koch impersonator, we now know that Scott Walker is a puppet. The Koch’s have purchased his election, with a combination of both direct funding and indirect funding through the Kochs’ vast network of right-wing organizations. We can only speculate on the Kochs’ true motivations, but if the talking points listed on their think tank websites give any indication, it involves a dismantling and part and parcel sale of government assets to private interests as well as an assault on environmental regulations. The New Yorker published an excellent article about the Koch Brothers last August. This exposé is quite illuminating in that it brings up a number of issues, including the roots of their interest in the Libertarian movement, how they gained political influence, and how they have now been able to buy elections across the country.

New Yorker: Covert Operations, The billionaire brothers who are waging a war against Obama

A sign from Saturday's protest in Madison (mjs538 at Buzzfeed)

The labor movement spreads across the country

Heated action spread from Wisconsin across the nation today, where Democrats have left the Statehouse in order to prevent the passage of another Tea Party bill that would eliminate the right of public employees to collectively bargain. This prompted Indiana Governor Daniels to suggest dropping the bill!

Unfortunately, leaving the state is not an option in Ohio, where Republicans can maintain a quorum without Democrats, though protests continued in the state’s capital, Columbus.

More rallies were held around the country in solidarity with the state employees in Wisconsin. There was a rally in Phoenix, Little Rock, there were 6000 in Sacramento, also in Palmdale, and a large rally in Denver, and in Des Moines, union protests vastly outnumbered a 50-person Tea Party squad. More rallies took place in Annapolis, 2000 showed up in Boston, workers packed the state capitol in St. Paul while a large group rallied outside Fox News in New York City, thousands surrounded the Statehouse in Columbus, joining several hundred people in Santa Fe, and in Providence, and Montpelier

Unions continue to plan more events, including Wednesday rallies in Hartford, Atlanta, Baton Rouge and Scranton. Check the SEIU website for more details. A number of unions around the country, including the Madison area AFL-CIO, are also preparing for a general strike if the union-busting bill is passed.

The crowd in Madison may have reached 68,000 again as demonstrations took place across the state of Wisconsin Tuesday, including up to 450 people in small towns like Waupaca (population 5,700). Meanwhile, Walker responded with threats during an ironically named “fireside chat”
in which he said that if the state budget bill is not passed by friday, he would lay off 1500 state workers.

Despite the Governor’s declaration that employees must avert disaster by paying more into their pensions, the state pension fund is one of the healthiest in the nation because pension payouts are funded to the tune of 99.67% while some states have pension funding levels as low as 54% due to a failure to act upon the promises made to workers. The pension fund is independent of the state’s general fund as well, which does have a roughly $140 million deficit due to the Governor’s tax subsidies and health care adjustments given to corporations.

But this bill is not about balancing the budget. Today, Walker signed a bill that would require a 2/3 majority vote for approving tax increases. That is right – Walker created a budget deficit, argued that state employees must pay for the difference in addition to losing their collective bargaining rights and the ability of unions to deduct union dues from their paychecks all while making it more difficult for the state to balance the budget. Here is what he said:

“I went to work today, met with my cabinet, and signed legislation that will help government operate within its means,” Governor Scott Walker said. “Wisconsinites can’t turn to raising taxes to balance their own family budgets when times get tough. This bill will ensure that we don’t kick the can down the road for a quick budget fix only to slap a long-term tax hike on the backs of Wisconsin taxpayers. I thank Senator Leah Vukmir and Representative Tyler August for their leadership on this issue.”

It gets better, the Governor, who was kicked out of Marquette University for cheating with a 2.4 GPA, has a long history of cronyism and incompetence. As Milwaukee County Commissioner, he illegally fired publicly-employed security staff from the Milwaukee County Courthouse and replaced them in a no-bid contract with members of a private security firm that has now obtained a rather inglorious reputation while working in Afghanistan.

Rachel Maddow discusses Walker's incompetence as Milwaukee County Commissioner (Rachel Maddow Show)

That is not all. The “Budget Repair Bill” has another provision, Section 16.896:

16.896 Sale or contractual operation of state-owned heating, cooling, and power plants. (1) Notwithstanding ss. 13.48 (14) (am) and 16.705 (1), the department may sell any state-owned heating, cooling, and power plant or may contract with a private entity for the operation of any such plant, with or without solicitation of bids, for any amount that the department determines to be in the best interest of the state. Notwithstanding ss. 196.49 and 196.80, no approval or certification of the public service commission is necessary for a public utility to purchase, or contract for the operation of, such a plant, and any such purchase is considered to be in the public interest and to comply with the criteria for certification of a project under s. 196.49 (3) (b).

So Governor Walker is planning to sell state assets – steam and power plants – in no-bid contracts to private companies. Could this perhaps involve Koch Industries? A Koch-funded group, Americans for Prosperity (an ironic title) is now purchasing ad time in support of Governor Walker’s proposals. This is corruption pure and simple: A Governor, elected on the purse strings of billionaires sells state assets to them so that they can charge the state to receive power from their new plants.

Scott Walker wants to sell state-owned power plants in no-bid contracts (Rachel Maddow Show)

Shenanigans continue in the Wisconsin State Legislature, leading to an impassioned response by a Democratic Assemblyman from Oshkosh. Today, the Democrats offered over 100 amendments to the Budget Bill in order to delay it a bit longer. The State Legislatures Phone Comment Line has shut down due to too many complaints and a pro-union website was blocked inside the Wisconsin State Capitol. Meanwhile, Indiana Democrats joined Wisconsin Democratic Senators in Illinois, following a similar strategy.

Popular opinion in the country is decidedly against the actions of the Tea Party. In a USA Today/Gallup Poll, Americans oppose weakening unions ability to collectively bargain 61-33%. Furthermore, the AFL-CIO hired Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research to conduct surveys over the past week. They were simple approve/disapprove surveys. Huffington Post reports the change in the data most prominently, which is unfortunate because it is a weak result that lies within the error bars but does show popular opinion moving from Walker to the Democratic Senators now out of state. The real, statistically significan result from the poll is shown here:

Reaction of Wisconsinites: With which groups do you agree given the current situation? (Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, via Huffington Post)

Scott Walker has nowhere to go. His approval rate is around 39%. He has just gone all-in and the state will turn on him provided that everyone learns his overreach in the deals to sell state assets in no-bid contracts. The state will become even more enraged if he follows through on his threat to fire state workers without a budget bill. Even some Republican Senators may be wavering. The protests can take them down, even if the corporate media is circling the wagons.

Yet, what is happening in Wisconsin is also happening across the country as Republican and Tea Party-led legislatures show the public what astroturf is made of. Bill after bill is designed to eliminate worker’s rights, sell public assets to companies so that the services can be sold back to the states. They seek to redact environmental laws. They cut jobs, and education, entitlements and health care, all being inefficient when viewed through the lens of the state as a funding source for corporations. The only way to stop this dismantling of American society now is to organize and to protest the leaders who adopt these draconian and corrupt laws. Scott Walker may be the first to break under the pressure – but you will not read that on CNN, Fox, or in other corporate media. They are circling the wagons and putting out headlines intended to dissuage protestors. More on that later.